1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00087901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon dating: avoiding errors by avoiding mixed samples

Abstract: Chronology and its refinement continues to be important, especially in the methods by which the dates are actually achieved. Here, the question of whether single object/bone samples provide more accurate dates than mixed samples is debated, and applied to samples from prehistoric Scotland.In an appendix, the recent radiocarbon dating of samples from within the Calanais stone circle on the Isle of Lewis, Scotland, opens up further debate on phasing and occupation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, this is further evidence for the dangers of using charcoal as a dating medium in Atlantic Scotland, because the birch will be approximately the same age as the peat (cf. Ashmore 1999;Church, 2002b). …”
Section: Archaeobotanical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this is further evidence for the dangers of using charcoal as a dating medium in Atlantic Scotland, because the birch will be approximately the same age as the peat (cf. Ashmore 1999;Church, 2002b). …”
Section: Archaeobotanical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of plant remains and charcoals, it is preferable that single entities such as twigs, seeds, and grains are selected for dating, because this avoids the incorporation of non-systematic offsets in age that may arise from the sampling of heartwood, branchwood, or mixed charcoals collected from archaeological sediments (McFadgen 1982;Ashmore 1999). It is also beneficial if individual species can be identified so that the dating of long-lived species can be avoided.…”
Section: Samples and Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this to be valid, however, the relative order in which the samples ceased to exchange carbon with the biosphere must be the same as the relative order of dirt in the ground. Samples must thus be not only short-lived, single-entities from a well-understood carbon reservoir (Ashmore 1999), but they must also have been freshly deposited in the context from which they were recovered. The association between the dated event and the target event (Dean 1978) is thus paramount.…”
Section: Chronological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%