2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocapitellar joint stability with bipolar versus monopolar radial head prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
34
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite predominantly good clinical results, dislocation of components, implant loosening, overstuffing and radiocapitellar arthritis regularly lead to removal and revision. Recent biomechanical testing showed a higher instability in the bipolar design compared to the monopolar design and the uninjured radial head, especially in cases of severe soft tissue damage [6,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite predominantly good clinical results, dislocation of components, implant loosening, overstuffing and radiocapitellar arthritis regularly lead to removal and revision. Recent biomechanical testing showed a higher instability in the bipolar design compared to the monopolar design and the uninjured radial head, especially in cases of severe soft tissue damage [6,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Partial radial head treatment may be an alternative to replacement of the head, which is now recommended by many authors for these cases. 10,17,18,26,27 This study does not address the relative advantages and disadvantages of partial radial head allograft compared with prosthetic radial head replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a bipolar implant potentially avoids or mitigates radiocapitellar maltracking, it could come at the expense of decreased ability to resist rotational instability. 19 The radial head prosthesis employed in this study was part of a commercially available total elbow system, but the optimal design of a radial head prosthesis to be used in conjunction with a capitellar component requires further study. We noted no significant differences in valgus angulation when the forearm was pronated A, C (P ϭ .07-.20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%