2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocapitellar Joint Contact Pressures Following Radial Head Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe the differences between our results and those of the results of Sahu et al to be related to the 100 N compression force applied during testing in their study (we did not apply any compression force in our study). Cohn et al found no significant difference between the native radial head and a modular monopolar RHA, tested in neutral position at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion, and 9 kg muscle load. Conversely, Bachman et al showed a significant increase in contact pressure with RHA compared with the native radial head in a neutral position, full‐extension, and with 160 N compressive load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We believe the differences between our results and those of the results of Sahu et al to be related to the 100 N compression force applied during testing in their study (we did not apply any compression force in our study). Cohn et al found no significant difference between the native radial head and a modular monopolar RHA, tested in neutral position at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion, and 9 kg muscle load. Conversely, Bachman et al showed a significant increase in contact pressure with RHA compared with the native radial head in a neutral position, full‐extension, and with 160 N compressive load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, we tried to ensure that the area of radiocapitellar joint contact was in the sensing area of the transducer. The 6,900 pressure transducer has formerly been used by others to compare the contact pressures in the native and implant radiocapitellar joint . However, it has some limitations in its use on non‐planar deformable surfaces, which should be taken into account when interpreting the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Biomechanical data illustrate that an overlengthening of 2.5 mm leads to a significant increase in radiocapitellar contact pressure. 54,55 The detection of overlengthening of the radial head is difficult. Frank and colleagues 56 showed in an in vitro study that overlengthening cannot be ruled out by a loss of parallelism of the ulnar ulnohumeral joint line on AP radiographs until there is 6 mm of overstuffing for monopolar implants in the MCL-sufficient elbow.…”
Section: Mason III and Ivmentioning
confidence: 99%