2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/14120.6074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiobiological Response of Cervical Cancer Cell Line in Low Dose Region: Evidence of Low Dose Hypersensitivity (HRS) and Induced Radioresistance (IRR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that the combined treated cells at 0·5 Gy gives the highest expression. Previous studies have shown that HeLa cells are known to exhibit hyper-radiosensitivity at radiation dose <1 Gy 9 . This correlates with our study in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed that the combined treated cells at 0·5 Gy gives the highest expression. Previous studies have shown that HeLa cells are known to exhibit hyper-radiosensitivity at radiation dose <1 Gy 9 . This correlates with our study in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies have shown that HeLa cells are known to exhibit hyper-radiosensitivity at radiation dose <1 Gy. 9 This correlates with our study in Figure 4. In addition, the cell survival curve for cells irradiated with radiation in conjunction with chemotherapeutic drug is steeper than the curve for cells with radiation alone.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The terminal portion of the survival curve follows an exponential relationship indicating that the radiation dose increment is proportional to the reduction of the survival fraction. However, doses between 0 and 0.5 Gy follows a typical pattern indicative of a transition between the low dose hypersensitive region and an induction of radio-resistance (Das et al 2015). This is seen to closely follow the induced repair model (R 2 = 0.97, p < 0.05) with the increased cell counts at doses lower than 0.25 Gy.…”
Section: Binary Dose Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These ideas are fiercely unpopular among those who wish to promote a threshold model of radiation protection because any possibility that radiation might cause any adverse low dose effects, means that a precautionary approach is likely to be retained when setting dose limits [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. The reality is that low dose hypersensitivity exists [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ] and non-targeted effects (discussed in the next section), can result in both “good” and “bad” effects [ 2 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The debate should not really be centered on whether low doses of radiation are good or bad but should be concerned with how systems deal with low doses of stressors and whether improved modelling or approaches such as adverse outcome pathway (AOP) analysis can improve our ability to understand and thus predict individual responses.…”
Section: Introduction To Low Dose and Non-targeted Radiobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%