1964
DOI: 10.1126/science.144.3616.288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioactivity in the Atmospheric Effluents of Power Plants That Use Fossil Fuels

Abstract: Analysis of the fly ash produced by combustion of pulverized Appalachian coal has shown that a 1000-megawatt coal-burning power plant will discharge into the atmosphere from about 28 millicuries to nearly 1 curie per year of radium-226 and radium-228. An oil-burning plant of similar size will discharge about 0.5 millicurie of radium per year. Comparison of these data with data on the release of fission products from nuclear-powered generating stations shows that when the physical and biological properties of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radionuclide of uranium and thorium series has been reported in FA (Eisenbud and Petrow 1964;Tadmore 1986;Papastefanou 2008). According to Zielinski and Finkelman (1997) majority of FA are insignificantly enriched in radioactive elements or in associated radioactivity compared to common soils or rocks, but this problem is quiet concern.…”
Section: Risk Associated With Fly Ash Amendmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Radionuclide of uranium and thorium series has been reported in FA (Eisenbud and Petrow 1964;Tadmore 1986;Papastefanou 2008). According to Zielinski and Finkelman (1997) majority of FA are insignificantly enriched in radioactive elements or in associated radioactivity compared to common soils or rocks, but this problem is quiet concern.…”
Section: Risk Associated With Fly Ash Amendmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At the beginning of the "nuclear era", some efforts were made to use U-bearing coals as a source of the U. However, with the discovery of higher-quality raw sources, the interest in U-bearing coals diminished and now they are considered to be potentially dangerous source of radioactive contamination of the environment (Bauman and Horvat, 1981;Bride and Moore, 1978;Eisenbud and Petrow, 1964;Mazuricheva and Kiselev, 2004). The world coal industry focuses on coals with low concentrations of radioactive elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, coal combustion is considered as one source of radioactive material in the environment [2][3][4][5]. Though it is controversial, the radiation doses from atmospheric emission of a coal-fired power plant were considered to be greater than those from a nuclear plant of comparable size [6,7]. In 1978, it was reported that as high as 2,975 kg uranium were emitted into the atmosphere from one Chinese coal-fired power plant [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%