1981
DOI: 10.2172/6084945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioactive waste management: a bibliography for the integrated data base program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integration efforts started in the 1980s by building an integrated database system that compiled information on waste generation and treatment, characteristics, inventories, and costs [11]. These efforts were later expanded to include projected inventories of spent fuel and analytical capabilities for the calculation of radioactivity and thermal power based on reported or estimated isotopic compositions [12].…”
Section: Current Integration Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration efforts started in the 1980s by building an integrated database system that compiled information on waste generation and treatment, characteristics, inventories, and costs [11]. These efforts were later expanded to include projected inventories of spent fuel and analytical capabilities for the calculation of radioactivity and thermal power based on reported or estimated isotopic compositions [12].…”
Section: Current Integration Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for an evaluation of the overall system is generally recognized [5,6]. For instance, efforts have been made for building unified information systems of radioactive materials at the point of waste generation [7][8][9], integrating the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S. [10,11], and conducting multi-criteria performance assessments of various nuclear fuel cycle options [12,13]. However, there has been no formalization of disposal systems from an integrated perspective, beyond the conventional risk-based systems approach of engineering assessments [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%