2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0265-931x(01)00093-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioactive contamination in the Arctic—sources, dose assessment and potential risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently reported 137 Cs activities in sea water from the study areas ranged from 2.0 to 3.4 Bq/m 3 (See Table 3 for references) compared to peak values of 20 to 45 Bq/m 3 for the Svalbard area and Barents Sea in the 1980s (Hallstadius et al, 1982;Kershaw and Baxter, 1995;Strand et al, 2002). Although a large number of potential local sources of radionuclide contamination are known in the region (dump sites of nuclear reactors and radioactive waste, atmospheric nuclear bomb testing sites on Novaya Zemlya).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recently reported 137 Cs activities in sea water from the study areas ranged from 2.0 to 3.4 Bq/m 3 (See Table 3 for references) compared to peak values of 20 to 45 Bq/m 3 for the Svalbard area and Barents Sea in the 1980s (Hallstadius et al, 1982;Kershaw and Baxter, 1995;Strand et al, 2002). Although a large number of potential local sources of radionuclide contamination are known in the region (dump sites of nuclear reactors and radioactive waste, atmospheric nuclear bomb testing sites on Novaya Zemlya).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The latitudinal distribution of the atmospheric 90 Sr deposition ([UNSCEAR, 1982]; see Fig. 4) makes it feasible to construct the latitudinal distribution of the atmospheric fallout of 137 Cs, with the fallout of 137 Cs a factor 1.6 higher than that of 90 Sr ( [Strand et al, 1998]). A total of four tracers are included in the simulation; the atmospheric fallout of 137 Cs and 90 Sr, and the Sellafleld discharge of 137 Cs and 90 Sr.…”
Section: The Radionuclides Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the distribution of 137 Cs was also a result of atmospheric transport and deposition (AMAP 2004;Romanov 2004;Vana 2004;Sapota et al 2009 (Gwynn et al 2004) while the radioactivity of 137 Cs in the North Atlantic water was below 1.5 Bq/m 3 (Gulin and Stokozov 2005) and in the Barents Sea around 3 Bq/m 3 (Strand et al 2002). This is due to the scattering of air masses contaminated with 137 Cs being transported from Chernobyl to the northwest.…”
Section: Jamtveit Et Al 2006)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Barents Sea, the main sources of anthropogenic radioactive contaminants are: atmospheric fallout (including Chernobyl fallout), discharges from the nuclear industry in Europe, assumed contribution from land-based sources in the northern Russia, dumped radioactive material of the former USSR and contribution from the Chernobyl accident via the Baltic Sea (Føyn and Svaeren 1997). Anthropogenic radioactive isotopes as well as their migration are investigated more often because of their potential dangerous influence on humans (UNSCEAR 2000;Strand et al 2002;AMAP 2003AMAP , 2004. Although data concerning natural gamma emitters in Svalbard are still lacking, Gwynn et al (2004) reported 137 Cs concentrations from seawater and sediments from several sites in Kongsfjorden and Isfjorden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%