2008
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2007.913144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio Wave Characterization and Modeling in Underground Mine Tunnels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
84
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
84
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained by Sun and Akyildiz [17], the delay spread in an underground surroundings is influenced by the number of significant modes which exists and the transmitter receiver distance. The same conclusion on the propagation behavior in underground environments was obtained in [3,4]. The mean excess delay and the maximum excess delay have also been computed for a threshold level of 15 dB.…”
Section: Time Propertiessupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As explained by Sun and Akyildiz [17], the delay spread in an underground surroundings is influenced by the number of significant modes which exists and the transmitter receiver distance. The same conclusion on the propagation behavior in underground environments was obtained in [3,4]. The mean excess delay and the maximum excess delay have also been computed for a threshold level of 15 dB.…”
Section: Time Propertiessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The path loss exponents are almost similar in both MIMO and SISO. Our results are compared to those obtained in the same mine, but in another gallery [3]. The obtained path loss exponent is around 2.03 at the .…”
Section: Path Lossmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For a rectangular tunnel, 8 m × 5.6 m, the theoretical values of the D s deduced from the ray approach are larger and vary from 6 ns in the near zone to 4 ns beyond 100 m. The difference may be due to the idealized rectangular shape of the tunnel in the theoretical model, instead of the curved shape of the tunnel where experiments took place. The values of D s can be compared to those measured in an empty tunnel, without obstacles, and described by other authors as in [3] and [6]. In a 70 m long mine gallery, it was shown [3] that D s in the 2.4 GHz band is less than or equal to 6.3 ns for 50% of all locations.…”
Section: Delay Spreadmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The values of D s can be compared to those measured in an empty tunnel, without obstacles, and described by other authors as in [3] and [6]. In a 70 m long mine gallery, it was shown [3] that D s in the 2.4 GHz band is less than or equal to 6.3 ns for 50% of all locations. The corresponding value for the 5.8 GHz band is 5 ns.…”
Section: Delay Spreadmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation