2015
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/632/1/012100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio signal correlation at 32 MHz with extensive air showers parameters

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 30-100 MHz region (figure 1), the 4 datasets from the most recent experiments (LOPES [25,26], YAKUTSK [28], AERA [29], and TUNKA-REX [30]) agree with each other within a factor of 3 and follow the expected quadratic dependence on E p . Although the power from AERA experiment is calculated in a different way than the other three experiments (see item iv) in the Appendix), the nice compatibility of all final results suggests that the approximations and assumptions done are reasonable.…”
Section: Ep [Ev]mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the 30-100 MHz region (figure 1), the 4 datasets from the most recent experiments (LOPES [25,26], YAKUTSK [28], AERA [29], and TUNKA-REX [30]) agree with each other within a factor of 3 and follow the expected quadratic dependence on E p . Although the power from AERA experiment is calculated in a different way than the other three experiments (see item iv) in the Appendix), the nice compatibility of all final results suggests that the approximations and assumptions done are reasonable.…”
Section: Ep [Ev]mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Air shower axis reconstructed separately by the data of the scintillation or Cherenkov detectors by maximum likelihood method. Energy of showers estimated by the radio pulse amplitude, according to [10].…”
Section: Lateral Distribution Of Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It draws attention to the presence of a signal at a great distance from the shower axis. But in this case, the signal ε(E, θ , R) was very close to noise level therefore it should be excluded from the analysis or we should have taken into account the noise influence like in [10]. For this reason, we selected for analysis air showers with signal amplitude exceeded the noise signal 5 times or more, i.e.…”
Section: Lateral Distribution Of Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, interest in the air shower radio emission, as an independent method to study the physics of the EAS has grown significantly, and for registration of radio emission were built arrays of significant size [15,16]. This method makes it possible not only to evaluate the energy but also to reconstruct the longitudinal shower development, namely, the depth of maximum X max [17,18]. This is especially important for huge arrays where the uncertainty in the estimation of shower energy with different methods of detecting air showers reaches about (20-40)%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%