2013
DOI: 10.1109/jcn.2013.000092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio resource management scheme for heterogeneous wireless networks based on access proportion optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To acquire full benefit of the use of HetNet, one of the mandatory requirements is the design of an appropriate radio resource management (RRM) for such network. This task is difficult due to the fact that wireless networks that composed the HetNet may vary in terms of network coverage, access cost, data transmission rate, service class support [13], to name a few criteria. For this reason, traditional RRM schemes for wireless networks may no longer be applied to HetNets.…”
Section: Radio Resource Management In Heterogeneous Wireless Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To acquire full benefit of the use of HetNet, one of the mandatory requirements is the design of an appropriate radio resource management (RRM) for such network. This task is difficult due to the fact that wireless networks that composed the HetNet may vary in terms of network coverage, access cost, data transmission rate, service class support [13], to name a few criteria. For this reason, traditional RRM schemes for wireless networks may no longer be applied to HetNets.…”
Section: Radio Resource Management In Heterogeneous Wireless Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [42], the blocking probability and nonblocking probability for the th AP are defined as (12) where ( ) denotes the fact that the blocking probability depends on the ratio of service arriving and leaving rate in (10). Then, the average user number can be rewritten as…”
Section: Wifi Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type is the resource allocation algorithm based on user utility optimization which always selects the service parameters related to QoS of subscriber services to evaluate network performance, such as received signal intensity, bit error rate, access bandwidth, price and etc, and allocates resources on the premise of optimal system user utility [14,15]; The second type is the algorithm based on system utility maximization which maximizes system interests through the allocation and distributed plans of services and the cooperative transmission service flow between multiple networks, such as power saving maximization, network system throughput maximization and network capacity utilization rate maximization; The third type is the algorithm based on fairness which quantizes the fairness of resource allocation through standardized formula and guarantees the fairness for different users, services and networks through mechanism, but other algorithms always cause damage to part of users' fairness in improving system throughput and reducing time delay.…”
Section: Correlation Research Access Selection and Admission Control mentioning
confidence: 99%