2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-020-00702-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio Properties of Tidal Disruption Events

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
135
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
8
135
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also compare the rate of radio-selected TDEs (CNSS 0019+00-like events) with that of optically-selected TDEs, ∼50 Gpc −3 yr −1 (van Velzen & Farrar 2014). The radio TDE rate therefore represents ∼20% of the rate of optically-selected TDEs, despite probing the same approximate volume (within z=0.1), though we note that this discrepancy is not unexpected given the uncertainty in the radio luminosity function of thermal TDEs 12 (Alexander et al 2020;Stone et al 2020). Finally, we note that, given our rate of radio TDEs, we expect to find tens of events like CNSS J0019+00 in all-sky radio surveys being executed with the VLA (VLASS; Lacy et al 2020) and ASKAP (Murphy et al 2013)-more numerous than the number of TDEs expected previously.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We can also compare the rate of radio-selected TDEs (CNSS 0019+00-like events) with that of optically-selected TDEs, ∼50 Gpc −3 yr −1 (van Velzen & Farrar 2014). The radio TDE rate therefore represents ∼20% of the rate of optically-selected TDEs, despite probing the same approximate volume (within z=0.1), though we note that this discrepancy is not unexpected given the uncertainty in the radio luminosity function of thermal TDEs 12 (Alexander et al 2020;Stone et al 2020). Finally, we note that, given our rate of radio TDEs, we expect to find tens of events like CNSS J0019+00 in all-sky radio surveys being executed with the VLA (VLASS; Lacy et al 2020) and ASKAP (Murphy et al 2013)-more numerous than the number of TDEs expected previously.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, it is clear that sub-mJy radio cores can conceal both strong SF and an active, low-brightness SMBH (Padovani 2016), even in a flaring or dimming stage of accretion, such as in the case of a TDE, as observed in our target NGC 3690 (Arp 299, Mattila et al 2018). Therefore, by eventually disentangling SF and SMBH activity and assessing the origin of the radio emission at the centre of our galaxies, the next LeMMINGs papers will make use of the optical and X-ray data along with our radio observations to address the following astrophysical open issues: the disc-jet connection in LLAGN (Merloni et al 2003), the contribution from SF (stellar processes and XRBs) in the GHz band and possible core variability due to transient phenomena (Mundell et al 2009;Alexander et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radio core variability on a time scale of a few years, episodic accretion onto the BH and nuclear inactivity expected within a typical duty cycle of 10 8 years could also account for their current none detection (e.g. Mundell et al 2009;Morganti 2017;Alexander et al 2020). Future e-MERLIN 5 GHz observations of the LeMMINGs targets with higher resolution and sensitivity will be able to possibly pinpoint the core with higher accuracy than L-band data.…”
Section: Undetected Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such flares are now regularly discovered, at a rate exceeding a few per year, by the various wide-field time-domain surveys (e.g. Gezari et al 2012;Arcavi et al 2014;Holoien et al 2014;van Velzen et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colliding streams, inflowing and outflowing gas, and a viewing-angle dependence on both the broad-band (Dai et al 2018) and spectroscopic (Nicholl et al 2019b) properties all contribute to a messy knot that must be untangled. One important clue comes from radio observations: although only a small (but growing) sample of TDEs has been detected in the radio, in such cases we can measure the properties (energy, velocity, and density) of an outflow directly (see recent review by Alexander et al 2020). In some TDEs this emission is from a relativistic jet (Bloom et al 2011;Burrows et al 2011;Zauderer et al 2011;Cenko et al 2012;Mattila et al 2018), which does not appear to be a common feature of TDEs, but other radio TDEs have launched subrelativistic outflows (Alexander et al 2016(Alexander et al , 2017van Velzen et al 2016;Anderson et al 2019) A number of radio-quiet TDEs have exhibited indirect evidence for slower outflows in the form of blueshifted optical/UV emission and absorption lines (Blanchard et al 2017;Roth & Kasen 2018;Hung et al 2019), suggesting that outflows may be common.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%