1995
DOI: 10.1086/117266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio properties of three young supernova remnants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
53
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1d).ÈThis young, Balmer-lineÈdominated SNR has a shell structure with an apparent gap to the southeast. The X-ray morphology is similar to that in radio images (Dickel & Milne 1995), although the gap is not as strongly deÐned in radio. This SNR has a shock velocity in the range of 1000È1900 km s~1 (Smith et al 1991), suggesting it is one of the younger LMC remnants.…”
Section: Appendix a Individual Snr Properties And Referencessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1d).ÈThis young, Balmer-lineÈdominated SNR has a shell structure with an apparent gap to the southeast. The X-ray morphology is similar to that in radio images (Dickel & Milne 1995), although the gap is not as strongly deÐned in radio. This SNR has a shock velocity in the range of 1000È1900 km s~1 (Smith et al 1991), suggesting it is one of the younger LMC remnants.…”
Section: Appendix a Individual Snr Properties And Referencessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…1c).ÈAlthough Mathewson et al (1983) classiÐed N103B as having centrally concentrated X-ray emission, an examination at higher resolution and sensitivity suggests that the remnant is in fact shell-type and that the brighter X-ray region is not central but in fact is located near the limb of the SNR. This o †set is easier to see in the radio images (Dickel & Milne 1995), which show a well-deÐned shell brightened to the west. A study by Hughes et al (1995) suggests that this SNR, although not Balmer-lineÈdominated at optical wavelengths, is nonetheless the result of a Type Ia SN explosion, based on characteristic lines in the X-ray spectra.…”
Section: Appendix a Individual Snr Properties And Referencesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Outside the fast-moving material is a bright x-ray shell (Long et al 1981;Mathewson et al 1983) that is associated with an optical emission line rim (Hughes 1994;Blair et al 1994) of radius ∼ 1 arcminute (∼ 13 parsecs). Dickel & Milne (1995) observed 6 centimeter radio emission that coincides with the x-ray shell. Blair et al (2000) found that the abundances derived for the ejecta in N132D roughly match models of a star with an initial mass of 35 M ⊙ with the following condition: the O-rich mantle of the progenitor star did not mix with deeper O-burning layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…FIGURE 1. Plot of X-ray image with 2.5 cm ATCA contours [1]. Contours are 1.7, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6, 0.3, and 0.1 mJy/beam.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] The radio and X-ray morphologies are strikingly similar; the western edge (near the HII region) shows considerable structure and is ∼ 3 times brighter than the eastern edge. [1,2] In both bands, the emission arises from a region 7 pc in diameter (d=50kpc to LMC assumed). Due to its proximity to a star forming region, it was originally suspected that N103B was the result of the core collapse of a massive object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%