2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17360.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio lobes and X-ray hotspots in the microquasar S26

Abstract: We have studied the structure and energetics of the powerful microquasar/shock‐ionized nebula S26 in NGC 7793, with particular focus on its radio and X‐ray properties. Using the Australia Telescope Compact Array, we have resolved for the first time the radio lobe structure and mapped the spectral index of the radio cocoon. The steep spectral index of the radio lobes is consistent with optically‐thin synchrotron emission; outside the lobes, the spectral index is flatter, suggesting an additional contribution fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaaret et al 2010), the supersoft ULX, M101 (Kong & Di Stefano 2005;Shen et al 2015), and the UV excess of SS433 (Dolan et al 1997). As the X-ray luminosity is expected to be low, the source may not fall into the empirical class of bright or even faint ULXs (see as possible examples Soria et al 2010Soria et al , 2014). Whilst we may not expect these to feature in ULX population studies, they represent an important set of 'hidden' ULXs, should provide interesting diagnostics for the winds (Middleton & Maccarone, in preparation) and are a necessary component of any model which hopes to describe the entire population.…”
Section: Source/population Evolution: Spectral Hardness Versus Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaaret et al 2010), the supersoft ULX, M101 (Kong & Di Stefano 2005;Shen et al 2015), and the UV excess of SS433 (Dolan et al 1997). As the X-ray luminosity is expected to be low, the source may not fall into the empirical class of bright or even faint ULXs (see as possible examples Soria et al 2010Soria et al , 2014). Whilst we may not expect these to feature in ULX population studies, they represent an important set of 'hidden' ULXs, should provide interesting diagnostics for the winds (Middleton & Maccarone, in preparation) and are a necessary component of any model which hopes to describe the entire population.…”
Section: Source/population Evolution: Spectral Hardness Versus Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 right), that corresponds to a physical scale of ∼350 pc at 95 Mpc. Some of the largest microquasar and ULX radio bubbles, like S26 and IC 342 X-1 (Soria et al 2010;Cseh et al 2012), have a size of ∼ 200 − 300 pc and a high radio luminosity of LR ≃ 2 × 10 35 erg/s that would correspond to ∼3 µJy at a distance of HLX-1. These sources would not be resolved and would not reach our detection threshold.…”
Section: Permanent Emission: Radio Bubble or Star Formation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other possible associations, like a single X-ray binary (such as CygX-3; Merloni et al 2003;Reines et al 2011) or an ultraluminous X-ray nebula (such as S26 and/or IC342X-1; Soria et al 2010;Cseh et al 2012), do not fit to the measured flux density of the persistent radio emission and/or the observed size by several orders of magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%