Radio-Frequency Identification Specimen Tracking to Improve Quality in Anatomic Pathology

Abstract

Context.— Preanalytic errors, including specimen labeling errors and specimen loss, occur frequently during specimen collection, transit, and accessioning. Radio-frequency identification tags can decrease specimen identification and tracking errors through continuous and automated tracking of specimens. Objective.— To implement a specimen tracking infrastructure to reduce preanalytic errors (specimen mislabeling or loss) between specimen collection and laboratory accessioning. Specific goals were to decrease preanalytic errors by at least 70% and to simultaneously decrease employee effort dedicated to resolving preanalytic errors or investigating lost specimens. Design.— A radio-frequency identification specimen-tracking system was developed. Major features included integral radio-frequency identification labels (radio-frequency identification tags and traditional bar codes in a single printed label) printed by point-of-care printers in collection suites; dispersed radio-frequency identification readers at major transit points; and systems integration of the electronic health record, laboratory information system, and radio-frequency identification tracking system to allow for computerized physician order entry driven label generation, specimen transit time tracking, interval-based alarms, and automated accessioning. Results.— In the 6-month postimplementation period, 6 mislabeling events occurred in collection areas using the radio-frequency identification system, compared with 24 events in the 6-month preimplementation period (75% decrease; P = .001). In addition, the system led to the timely recovery of 3 lost specimens. Labeling expenses were decreased substantially in the transition from high-frequency to ultrahigh frequency radio-frequency identification tags. Conclusions.— Radio-frequency identification specimen tracking prevented several potential specimen-loss events, decreased specimen recovery time, and decreased specimen labeling errors. Increases in labeling/tracking expenses for the system were more than offset by time savings and loss avoidance through error mitigation.

Design, Development, and Evaluation of the Blood Collection Management Workstation

“…41 In contrast, technology was instrumental in pre-analytical error reduction. 42 In our study, we used the RFID, barcode reading, and facial recognition technologies in the labeling, and to support nurses in preparing, delivering, documenting, and reviewing procedures, which ensured optimized traceability and also improved workflow to reduce turnaround time. Similar studies also reported positive results.…”

Information adequacy in histopathology request forms: a milestone in making a communication bridge between confusion and clarity in medical diagnosis

“…Other effective means can be the use of computerized lab test request systems that can guide the requesting clinicians to properly send a complete pathology lab request ( 25 ). Moreover, barcoding and specimen tracking systems such as radio frequency identification (RFID)-based systems have been found useful in this regard ( 26 , 27 ). With the help of such systems, many required items, and especially demographics and lab and radiology findings, can automatically be filled in by available data in the patients’ electronic medical records and therefore clinicians can focus on the communication of essential clinical items on the request forms.…”

Effect of immediate cold formalin fixation on phosphoprotein IHC tumor biomarker signal in liver tumors using a cold transport device

“…This cold transport device has the potential to reduce the preanalytical variability observed in preservation and transport issues (25) by monitoring tissue temperature and time of fixation. When coupled with a radio frequency identification system (RFID) identifying both the specimen and transport box 19 , it adds an additional layer of assurance that the specimen is properly labeled and tracked to ensure proper identification of specimens. Monitoring fixation time could lead to better standardization of processing and lead to overall reduction of errors by improving reproducibility for higher quality tissue.…”