2017
DOI: 10.1177/205684601761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical right-wing movements: Who, when, how and why?

Abstract: This article provides an overview of the existing research on the causes of radical right-wing movements, a topic often neglected in the literature in comparison with the academic attention paid to radical right political parties and elections. It illustrates individual, organizational and contextual explanations for the emergence and mobilization (including violence) of right-wing movements in Europe and beyond, providing comparative empirical studies and data as illustration. The article concludes by discuss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more research is needed to differentiate under what circumstances which kind of group membership may actually be detrimental to democratic support. In light of research concerned with mobilization networks of radical groups, it is likely that social groups can potentially mobilize populist voters under certain circumstances and hence should be considered negative social capital (Caiani, 2017; Klandermans & Mayer, 2005). To summarize, the second part of our analysis shows that, whereas social belonging is beneficial for turnout per se, it depends when it comes to voting for populist parties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more research is needed to differentiate under what circumstances which kind of group membership may actually be detrimental to democratic support. In light of research concerned with mobilization networks of radical groups, it is likely that social groups can potentially mobilize populist voters under certain circumstances and hence should be considered negative social capital (Caiani, 2017; Klandermans & Mayer, 2005). To summarize, the second part of our analysis shows that, whereas social belonging is beneficial for turnout per se, it depends when it comes to voting for populist parties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Некоторые исследователи правого радикализма -например, М. Кайяни [Caiani 2017], К. Мюдде [Mudde 2007], Е. Ральф-Морроу [Ralph-Morrow 2020])в своих научных работах подчеркивают, что важнейшей чертой идеологии и дискурса праворадикальных партий являются идеи порядка, приоритета семейных ценностей, а также рассуждения о негативных моментах современных гендерных исследований. Поэтому неудивительно, что и в программе партии «Британия -прежде всего» есть раздел, который носит название «Семейные ценности и мораль».…”
Section: идеи политкорректности в дискурсе британских крайне правых: ...unclassified
“…Em termos mundiais, uma ascensão da direita, nos últimos anos, foi marcada pelo crescimento e fortalecimento de um variado conjunto de partidos políticos e movimentos sociais em um enorme número de países (Caiani 2017;Castelli Gattinara and Pirró 2018;Zúquete 2018).…”
Section: Far-right E Direita Populistaunclassified
“…A questão da islamização é um ponto de alta importância para o que é debatido nesse artigo, pois o que é chamado de islamofobia tornou-se um tema de enquadramento comum nos movimentos e partidos da direita populista radical, ou da chamada nova direita em geral. O processo de imigração, em linhas gerais, já é, há algumas décadas, um dos principais pontos de enquadramento da far-right europeia (Caiani 2017;Castelli Kaiser 2020). islã e migração se tornaram termos que, à primeira vista, soam como intercambiáveis nos discursos da direita, seja dos partidos, seja das redes de movimentos, de forma que um passou a ser associado ao outro.…”
Section: O Islã E a Far-rightunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation