1993
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100125435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical mastoidectomy: its place in otitic intracranial complications

Abstract: Standard recommended treatment for patients with intracranial complications from otitis media, has been radical mastoidectomy, whether cholesteatoma is present or not. This was established in the pre-antibiotic era to improve survival. Over a six-year period, from January 1985 to December 1990, 268 patients were admitted with intracranial and extracranial complications of otitis media. The prospective treatment consisted of antibiotics and surgery. Surgery entailed mastoidectomy and drainage of intracranial co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
79
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(50 reference statements)
8
79
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision for the choice of surgical technique is of particular importance to preserve a higher hearing rate and prevent complications such as infection, cerebral hernia, recurrence, and treatment failure [2,3]. Imaging of the temporal bone, with CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is playing an increasingly important role for diagnosis, surgical decision, and follow up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision for the choice of surgical technique is of particular importance to preserve a higher hearing rate and prevent complications such as infection, cerebral hernia, recurrence, and treatment failure [2,3]. Imaging of the temporal bone, with CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is playing an increasingly important role for diagnosis, surgical decision, and follow up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, currently, surgical drainage of the abscess via a radical mastoidectomy, canal wall up mastoidectomy or craniotomy, remains the treatment of choice [10]. The use of canal wall up mastoidectomy appears to be an acceptable alternative to radical mastoidectomy, with no significant difference in the mortality or morbidity between the two techniques [10,16]. Some suggest that the main indication for the latter technique is a cholesteatomatous ear [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of canal wall up mastoidectomy appears to be an acceptable alternative to radical mastoidectomy, with no significant difference in the mortality or morbidity between the two techniques [10,16]. Some suggest that the main indication for the latter technique is a cholesteatomatous ear [16]. A craniotomy performed concurrently with a mastoidectomy treats both the source of the infection and its complications and has been shown to be safe [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional approach was to drain the abscess through a burr hole and some time through a craniotomy with abscess excision. Once the patient's condition stabilized, the source of infection has to be eradicated through a radical mastoidectomy [8,9]. Unfortunately, this approach is causing trauma to healthy brain tissue and spreading the infection to healthy brain areas [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the patient's condition stabilized, the source of infection has to be eradicated through a radical mastoidectomy [8,9]. Unfortunately, this approach is causing trauma to healthy brain tissue and spreading the infection to healthy brain areas [9,10]. Alternate approach is to drain their abscess through the radical mastoid cavity following the route of infection using aspiration technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%