Radical and Radical Ion Reactivity in Nucleic Acid Chemistry 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470526279.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical Intermediates during Reductive Electron Transfer through DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spin density plot of the fully optimized T-6H 2 O •– obtained using the B3LYP/6-31++G** method is shown in Figure , while the spin density plot for other optimized systems before and after electron transfer are also shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. The optimized result for T-6H 2 O •– (Figure ) appears in direct contrast with the experimental fact that all DNA bases react at diffusion controlled rates with e aq – . , , The unpaired electron spin distribution shown in Figure appears anomalous since the stable position for the electron is actually on the thymine, not in the water cavity as shown in the figure. However, this metastable state converts to the stable molecular arrangement when molecular dynamics induces the electron transfer as described below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spin density plot of the fully optimized T-6H 2 O •– obtained using the B3LYP/6-31++G** method is shown in Figure , while the spin density plot for other optimized systems before and after electron transfer are also shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. The optimized result for T-6H 2 O •– (Figure ) appears in direct contrast with the experimental fact that all DNA bases react at diffusion controlled rates with e aq – . , , The unpaired electron spin distribution shown in Figure appears anomalous since the stable position for the electron is actually on the thymine, not in the water cavity as shown in the figure. However, this metastable state converts to the stable molecular arrangement when molecular dynamics induces the electron transfer as described below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In a recent report, Abel and co-workers used the VDE (3.3 eV) for e aq – to interpret the binding of e aq – with nucleobases. On the basis of the VDE, they concluded that e aq – should not bind with nucleobases (see Figures 4, 5, and 13 in refs– as nucleobases have electron affinities in the range of ca. 1.7–2.2 eV. , Their interpretation concerning the reactivity of e aq – with nucleobases is incorrect since it ignores the well-established experimental fact that the solvated electron, e aq – , efficiently adds to all the nucleobases. ,,, These include many works using pulse radiolysis that report near diffusion-controlled reaction rates (3.8 × 10 9 M –1 s –1 to 1.8 × 10 10 M –1 s –1 ; see Table 10.6 in ref ) of e aq – with DNA/RNA components. , Moreover, as emphasized in this work, the addition of e aq – to the nucleobases should follow its AEA and not its VDE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different quenching effects observed for the fluorescence of the 5-aza-7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaguanine pyrene conjugates most probably result from charge separation between the pyrene residues and the nucleobases (intramolecular electron transfer or hole transfer). It is reported that 7-deazapurine conjugates form a charge separated state with a nucleobase radical cation and a radical anion of pyrene. , A similar behavior is expected for 5-aza-7-deazapurine pyrene conjugates. The higher quantum yields of the 5-aza-7-deazapurine pyrene conjugates might result from a higher oxidation potential of the 5-aza-7-deazaguanine to 7-deazaguanine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggestion that DNA might be a molecular wire 3 spurred applications of fast-detection optical methods to further advance our understanding of charge separation (CS) in DNA. 4 But advances in understanding EET have lagged that of hT, 4a, b, 5 in part because the quantum yield for EE obtained by photochemical injection is very small, ~10 −3 6 due, in part, to charge recombination with the electron donor. This problem does not arise in EPR studies of trapped EE, where a covalently bound electron donor does not supply the attached electron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b, 5 Anderson and Wright studied CT using the reaction of aqueous electrons generated by pulse radiolysis at RT. They determined transfer distances of ≤ 3–7 bp which are governed by a free energy of activation of ≥ 26 kJ mol −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%