2021
DOI: 10.1080/1536383x.2021.1880393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical character of non-IPR isomer 17418 (C1) of fullerene C76

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our calculations, the average distance of U–C is 2.55 Å at the B3LYP/6-31G* level, which is approximately the same with the previous reports which are calculated in the PBE functional and Slater TZP basis sets (PBE/TZP level) . Among the three original cages, the classical fullerene C 1 – #17418 C 76 has the lowest energy, and the metal-embedded derivative U@C 1 – #17418 C 76 has a HOMO–LUMO gap of 1.299 eV, which is consistent with the calculation results of other reports . The non-classical carbon cage C 1 –C 76 (NC3) with three heptagons is the most active system in the pure cage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to our calculations, the average distance of U–C is 2.55 Å at the B3LYP/6-31G* level, which is approximately the same with the previous reports which are calculated in the PBE functional and Slater TZP basis sets (PBE/TZP level) . Among the three original cages, the classical fullerene C 1 – #17418 C 76 has the lowest energy, and the metal-embedded derivative U@C 1 – #17418 C 76 has a HOMO–LUMO gap of 1.299 eV, which is consistent with the calculation results of other reports . The non-classical carbon cage C 1 –C 76 (NC3) with three heptagons is the most active system in the pure cage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At the B3LYP/6-31G*//B3LYP/6-31G levels, we have also analyzed the sum of Mulliken charges on all carbon atoms on cage (ρ C ) for C 1 –C 76 (NC3)­Cl 24 and U@C 1 – #17418 C 76 , as well as the average of natural charges (NBO) , for C 2 –C 76 (NC2)­(CF 3 ) 14 . The related results of the non-IPR isomer obtained by using the above-mentioned method are well consistent with the previous studies, which carry out smaller basis sets, such as 6-31G. , Comparatively, our results are likely to be more accurate and credible due to the more reliable and reasonable computational level.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations