1982
DOI: 10.1063/1.443720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative transition probabilities of Er3+ in yttria stabilized cubic zirconia crystals

Abstract: Er3+ doped yttria stabilized cubic zirconia crystals were prepared by the skull melting method. From the absorption maxima in the range 330–1700 nm the eigenvectors for Er3+ were calculated. This was followed by the calculation of the transition matrix elements between each pair of electronic levels. The Judd–Ofelt parameters were obtained by fitting the measured oscillator strengths to their predicted values using the above calculated matrix elements. These, combined with the Judd–Ofelt parameters, yielded ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Er 3+ ion, the linear relations are given below by fitting different data [22,[27][28][29][30][31][32] (Fig. 5)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Er 3+ ion, the linear relations are given below by fitting different data [22,[27][28][29][30][31][32] (Fig. 5)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since this approximation is not enough to describe the luminescence signal from level 5, an analysis was made to investigate the role played by the CR, ET, and radiative and nonradiative decays for n 5 . The radiative decay rate was taken from the experimental data for ZrO 2 bulk crystal and the nonradiative decay rate was estimated using the energy gap law with parameters of ZBLAN glass 20,21 that are not expect to be much different than for ZrO 2 and HfO 2 . The estimated value of the total transition rate from level 5 is 1.6ϫ 10 4 s −1 corresponding to a decay time of 62.5 s. Since this time is very short and does not find correspondence to the measured data, the dynamical response observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Er 3 + ion, the linear relations are given below by fitting different data [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (Table 3 and Fig. 2):…”
Section: Absorption Spectrum and The Judd-ofelt Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%