1988
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1988)027<1055:rttsta>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative Transfer to Space through a Precipitating Cloud at Multiple Microwave Frequencies. Part I: Model Description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Well known profile retrieval algorithms include those described by Kummerow & Giglio (1994a,b) and by Mugnai & Smith (1988), Mugnai et al (1993) and Smith et al (1994).…”
Section: Ssm/i Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well known profile retrieval algorithms include those described by Kummerow & Giglio (1994a,b) and by Mugnai & Smith (1988), Mugnai et al (1993) and Smith et al (1994).…”
Section: Ssm/i Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three to five channels of LEO PMW sensors are normally available at 10, 19, 23, 37, and 85 or 89/91 GHz and both vertical and horizontal polarizations are usually utilized. The low frequency channels are for measuring emission signals from the surface and atmosphere, while the high frequency channels measure the suppressed T B due to the scattering effects of ice particles [6][7][8][9]. In general, convective clouds associated with TCs have many frozen hydrometeors above the freezing level (~4500 m) and they scatter the energy in the 85-91 GHz channels, thus depressing the signal received by the LEO PMW sensor above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For physically based retrievals these relationships are obtained from physical descriptions of the atmosphere, and the underlying surface, within a radiative transfer model and take the form of either model functions or retrieval databases that are used as the basis for the development of the inversion: the retrieval algorithm (e.g., Wilheit et al 1977;Mugnai and Smith 1988;Smith and Mugnai 1988;Tao et al 1990; Kummerow et al 1991Kummerow et al , 1996Kummerow et al , 2001Smith et al 1992;Simpson and Tao 1993;Wentz and Spencer 1998;Panegrossi et al 1998;Olson et al 1999). As such, the retrievals are subject to the assumptions that went into building the relationship between the observables and the parameters of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%