2018
DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-8829-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative impact of an extreme Arctic biomass-burning event

Abstract: Abstract. The aim of the presented study was to investigate the impact on the radiation budget of a biomass-burning plume, transported from Alaska to the High Arctic region of Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, in early July 2015. Since the mean aerosol optical depth increased by the factor of 10 above the average summer background values, this large aerosol load event is considered particularly exceptional in the last 25 years. In situ data with hygroscopic growth equations, as well as remote sensing measurements as input… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our case with solar elevation >25( Arctic summer, noon) and surface albedo of 0.14 we obtained large and negative net forcing, which means a pronounced cooling of about -95 W/m 2 per unit AOD500. Recently, Lisok et al (2018) used MODTRAN simulations for this same event and came up with a direct aerosol forcing of -78.9 W/m 2 for AOD ¼0.64 at the surface, and a lower but still significant negative forcing at the top of atmosphere, in good agreement to our measurements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For our case with solar elevation >25( Arctic summer, noon) and surface albedo of 0.14 we obtained large and negative net forcing, which means a pronounced cooling of about -95 W/m 2 per unit AOD500. Recently, Lisok et al (2018) used MODTRAN simulations for this same event and came up with a direct aerosol forcing of -78.9 W/m 2 for AOD ¼0.64 at the surface, and a lower but still significant negative forcing at the top of atmosphere, in good agreement to our measurements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The secondary maxima in July for trueβM532̿ and in July 2015 for trueβM532¯, seen in Figures a and a, respectively, may have been caused by the reported smoke events in Ny‐Ålesund from biomass burning during that month (Lisok et al, ). The data from 10 and 11 July, when the smoke concentration was the highest, were not included when calculating trueβM532¯ or trueβM532̿ due to the poor signal‐to‐noise ratio at an altitude of 12–15 km caused by the high extinction of the laser light through the smoke clouds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Significant correlations (R > 0.5) of AOD CL and PM 2.5 were reported mainly for the eastern cities of China (Guo et al, 2009;Zheng et al, 2015;Zang et al, 2017) and the United States (Liu et al, 2007;Hutchison et al, 2008;Wang and Christopher, 2003), where the main industrial regions with extreme pollution are located. In these cases, the majority of aerosol was expected to be present within the boundary layer.…”
Section: Interrelations Between Different Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%