1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.35.896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative corrections to neutrino indices of refraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
130
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding "matter potential," however, is too small to solve the solar neutrino puzzle or affect significantly the SM effect due to charged current ν e − e scattering. On the other hand, the SM matter effects in ν µ ↔ ν τ oscillations are suppressed by ∼ (m τ /πM W ) 2 [33], so that non SM effects could be dominant and perhaps detectable. In the minimal flat model, ν µ ↔ ν τ oscillations in neutral matter are modified to…”
Section: Matter Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding "matter potential," however, is too small to solve the solar neutrino puzzle or affect significantly the SM effect due to charged current ν e − e scattering. On the other hand, the SM matter effects in ν µ ↔ ν τ oscillations are suppressed by ∼ (m τ /πM W ) 2 [33], so that non SM effects could be dominant and perhaps detectable. In the minimal flat model, ν µ ↔ ν τ oscillations in neutral matter are modified to…”
Section: Matter Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of neutrino-neutrino interactions, since the L-resonance is always adiabatic, the e 's leave the star as 2 . In the case of e the evolution depends on sin 2 13 [6]. For values larger than 10 ÿ3 they propagate also adiabatically (MSW transformation) and escape as 3 , whereas for values smaller than 10 ÿ5 the transition at the H-resonance is strongly nonadiabatic: there is a jump of matter eigenstates from the e 's leave the star as 1 .…”
Section: Vanishing Mu-tau Matter Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) because they are the same for neutrinos of all three species and therefore do not affect neutrino oscillations. This, however, is only true in leading (tree) order; radiative corrections induce tiny differences between the neutral current potentials of ν e , ν µ and ν τ and, in particular, result in a very small ν µ -ν τ potential difference V µτ ∼ 10 −5 V [1]. This quantity is negligible in most situations but may be important for supernova neutrinos.…”
Section: Neutrino Oscillations In Matter (3f )mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, until relatively recently most of the studies of neutrino oscillations were performed in the 2-flavour framework. There were essentially two reasons for that: (1) simplicity -there are much fewer parameters in the 2-flavour case than in the 3-flavour one, and the expressions for the transition probabilities are much simpler and by far more tractable, and (2) the hierarchy of ∆m 2 values, which allows to effectively decouple different oscillation channels. The 2-flavour approach proved to be a good first approximation, which is a consequence of the hierarchy ∆m ⊙ ≪ ∆m atm and of the smallness of the leptonic mixing parameter |U e3 |.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%