1987
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.77.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative Correction to e+ e- ->   in Electroweak Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter ε is defined as: 11) where the coefficient λ is of order 1 and cannot be calculated explicitly without knowledge of the full quantum gravity theory. In the following analysis we will assume that λ = ±1 in order to study both the cases of positive and negative interference.…”
Section: Large Extra Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter ε is defined as: 11) where the coefficient λ is of order 1 and cannot be calculated explicitly without knowledge of the full quantum gravity theory. In the following analysis we will assume that λ = ±1 in order to study both the cases of positive and negative interference.…”
Section: Large Extra Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the W-pair threshold weak corrections of up to 1.2% are expected for cos θ = 0 [34,35]. At the energies considered in this analysis the corrections are smaller, e.g.…”
Section: Qed Born Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The data analysed were collected with the DELPHI detector [1] at LEP 2, at collision energies, √ s, ranging from 161 GeV up to 208 GeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 656.4 pb −1 . The studied reaction is an almost pure QED (Quantum ElectroDynamics) process which, at orders above α 2 , is mainly affected by QED corrections, such as soft and hard bremsstrahlung and virtual corrections, compared to which the weak corrections due to the exchange of virtual massive gauge bosons are very small [2][3][4]. Therefore, any significant deviation between the measured and the predicted QED cross-sections could unambiguously be interpreted as a manifestation of non-standard physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%