1984
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(84)90615-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative capture and charge exchange of negative pions on protons at 26.4 and 39.3 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in Fig. 10 and compared to the GWU FA08 partial-wave analysis and to the previous data [7,8,12,14,19]. As expected from the differential cross sections, our results agree with PWA predictions for the momentum 178 MeV/c, and are higher then predictions for the other momenta.…”
Section: A Systematic Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are shown in Fig. 10 and compared to the GWU FA08 partial-wave analysis and to the previous data [7,8,12,14,19]. As expected from the differential cross sections, our results agree with PWA predictions for the momentum 178 MeV/c, and are higher then predictions for the other momenta.…”
Section: A Systematic Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The first CEX data below 100 MeV come from an experiment that used a single large NaI detector [7], [8]. The detector was placed at seven angles and collected continuous γ energy spectra that were unfolded into CEX angular distributions, for six energies between 27.4 and 91.7 MeV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to join these results to those of Gilman in the resonance region we have used the parametrization of Blomquist and Laget [13]. Recent data [14] show that the neutron cross section is larger than the proton one by a sizeable amount in agreement with the threshold values and with the parametrization of Blomquist-Laget; the difference between proton and proton-neutron averaged contribution is illustrated in Fig.4. With this data we evaluate the electromagnetic average polarizability ~N= 15.5-10-4 fm.…”
Section: Znmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The response of TINA and MINA to a monoenergetic y ray can be fairly well described by the empirical function [45] P(E, A, B,C,D) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%