1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.54.2040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative and inner-shell dielectronic recombination in a highly charged barium ion

Abstract: The direct radiative recombination ͑RR͒ to nϭ3, 4, and 5 levels and the resonant dielectronic recombination ͑DR͒ cross section involving 2p→3d excitation of Sc-like barium Ba 35ϩ and Ti-like barium Ba 34ϩ are calculated and compared with a recent electron beam ion trap experiment at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Assuming a fractional population of Ba 35ϩ in the trap of about 30%, we obtain good agreement between theory and experiment for the cross section ratio ͑DR͒/ ͑RR͒͑nϭ4͒, as well as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EBIT is a versatile light source, capable of producing nearly any ion charge state of nearly any element. A fine control of the charge state distribution in the trap is due to a very narrow electron energy distribution function (EEDF) of the beam (width 60 eV) [5]. A detailed description of the NIST EBIT can be found elsewhere [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBIT is a versatile light source, capable of producing nearly any ion charge state of nearly any element. A fine control of the charge state distribution in the trap is due to a very narrow electron energy distribution function (EEDF) of the beam (width 60 eV) [5]. A detailed description of the NIST EBIT can be found elsewhere [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two possible meanings of "beam temperature": (1) overall beam temperature, or full energy spread, and (b) transverse beam temperature. Regarding the first, the paper cited by LLNL in [15] concerning this issue determined their beam temperature to be 50 eV [22], larger than the 45 eV value determined previously for the NIST EBIT [23]. The actual value for the NIST EBIT during the Fe XVII experiment is likely to have been even less since we operated at reduced beam currents (one component of the temperature is proportional to the space charge, which scales linearly with beam current).…”
Section: X-ray Microcalorimetrymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The NIST experiment has been described previously [3]. In summary, a strong X-ray emission peak was observed at 4.6 keV, and several smaller peaks were measured at Xray energies in the range 2.4 keV4 44.3 keV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%