2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1013129713315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative and Evaporative Cooling in the Entrainment Zone of Stratocumulus – the Role of Longwave Radiative Cooling Above Cloud Top

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows four sets of such patterns for TO10 which are given the name “pods” (for a detailed description of pods for POST flights as well as analyses of their EIL, see Hill []). Similar vertical patterns have been used in Sc by VanZanten and Duynkerke [], for a brief time during DYCOMS II, and by Katzwinkel et al . [].…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure shows four sets of such patterns for TO10 which are given the name “pods” (for a detailed description of pods for POST flights as well as analyses of their EIL, see Hill []). Similar vertical patterns have been used in Sc by VanZanten and Duynkerke [], for a brief time during DYCOMS II, and by Katzwinkel et al . [].…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mixture fraction analysis relates buoyancy ( b ) of mixtures consisting of cloudy air at cloud top and of air above the EIL to mixing fractions given by χ=m2/m1+m2where m 1 is the mass of air from above the EIL in the mixture and m 2 is the mass of cloudy air in the mixture. This analysis has been used frequently [ Siems et al ., ; Wang and Albrecht , ; Shao et al ., ; Stevens , ; VanZanten and Duynkerke , ; de Roode and Wang , ; Mellado et al ., ; Kurowski et al ., ; Yamaguchi and Randall , ; Hill , ; S. A. Hill et al, The entrainment interface layer of stratocumulus‐toped boundary layers during POST, submitted to Atmosphere Research , 2013]. The analysis predicts in part the amount of negative buoyancy caused by LWC evaporation in mixtures of corresponding χ values.…”
Section: Microphysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last term in this expression represents the fraction of radiative flux divergence that reduces the enthalpy but not the buoyancy. The reason for this distinction is that radiative cooling decreases q e s (h, q t ), the saturation vapor humidity, which leads to condensation [(∂ t q ) pha > 0] and thus condensational warming, which compensates part of the radiative cooling (e.g., Shao et al 1997, van Zanten & Duynkerke 2002. This effect explains that the buoyancy in Figure 4 varies slower with ψ in cloudy-air regions than in clear-air regions.…”
Section: Interaction Between Evaporative and Radiative Coolingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The variable ψ quantifies diabatic effects (Moeng et al 1995, Shao et al 1997, van Zanten & Duynkerke 2002, Yamaguchi & Randall 2012, de Lozar & Mellado 2015b. Hence, cloud-top entrainment is often discussed in terms of pure mixing (which includes latent-heat effects) and deviations thereof by radiative transfer and microphysical effects.…”
Section: Evaporative Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequent turbulent motion and entrainment leads to mixing between the cloudy air and the relatively warmer and drier air above, which produces evaporation of cloud droplets. Often this evaporative cooling contributes to a negative buoyancy (Vanzanten and Duynkerke, 2002) leading to a further instability processcalled buoyancy reversal -related to the reduction of the buoyancy of the entrained air parcel to below that of the unmixed cloudy air, so that the parcel sinks through the cloud producing a positive feedback between downdraft, turbulent mixing and evaporating cooling (Lock and MacVean, 1999). In this case, even if in the CTBL the longwave radiative cooling at the cloud top constitutes a major source of generating and maintaining turbulence (Moeng, 2000), the entrainment of free-atmospheric air can also generate turbulent kinetic energy, differently from the cloud-free boundary-layer case (Lock and Mac Vean, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%