2016
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-15-0503.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative and Dynamical Influences on Polar Stratospheric Temperature Trends

Abstract: Radiative and dynamical heating rates control stratospheric temperatures. In this study, radiative temperature trends due to ozone depletion and increasing well-mixed greenhouse gases from 1980 to 2000 in the polar stratosphere are directly evaluated, and the dynamical contributions to temperature trends are estimated as the residual between the observed and radiative trends. The radiative trends are obtained from a seasonally evolving fixed dynamical heating calculation with the Parallel Offline Radiative Tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(65 reference statements)
7
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Schneider et al (2015) concluded that the tropical SSTs were the main drivers via teleconnections of the autumn trends, based on the ensemble mean of all of the CAM4 simulations with ozone depletion not showing a strong forced response. However, unlike the sonde data shown here, the ozone depletion in the SPARC dataset shows negligible trends in the fall (Ivy et al 2016) and thus would not be expected to show a forced response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schneider et al (2015) concluded that the tropical SSTs were the main drivers via teleconnections of the autumn trends, based on the ensemble mean of all of the CAM4 simulations with ozone depletion not showing a strong forced response. However, unlike the sonde data shown here, the ozone depletion in the SPARC dataset shows negligible trends in the fall (Ivy et al 2016) and thus would not be expected to show a forced response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…PORT utilizes the radiation code from NCAR's Community Atmosphere Model, version 4 (CAM4; Gent et al 2011), and calculates the changes in radiatively adjusted temperatures in a seasonally evolving fixed dynamical heating calculation above a defined masked level (typically defined as the tropopause, but here set to 500 hPa to allow the temperatures to adjust into the upper troposphere); the methodology is similar to that in Ivy et al (2016). For the PORT calculation, a full three-dimensional ozone climatology was used to prescribe a predepletion background distribution.…”
Section: B Port Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that the magnitude of model Antarctic temperature trends is similar for the ozone decline and partial recovery periods, although the corresponding ozone changes are much larger for 1979–1997. Relatively weaker cooling for 1979–1997 may reflect compensation from increased downwelling over the polar cap, as suggested in (Calvo et al, , Fu et al, , Ivy et al, , & Lin et al, ). We note that the Arctic lower stratosphere shows marginally significant cooling in the model during this 1998–2014 period, although ozone changes are not significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ivy et al . [] showed that GHG‐induced cooling using PORT were smaller than 0.5 K/decade and had little seasonal structure; these changes are relatively small compared to the features of interest (see below). The SD‐WACCM simulations provide two estimates of ozone changes post‐2000: using time‐evolving chemistry plus dynamics/temperature driven by MERRA reanalysis data (chem‐dyn‐vol) and using time‐evolving chemistry alone (chem‐only).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies suggest that the Antarctic ozone hole has affected stratospheric dynamics, although greenhouse gas increases during the same period also have contributed to the dynamical changes [e.g., Thompson and Solomon , ; Manzini et al ., ; Cai , ; Son et al ., ; Butchart et al ., ; McLandress et al ., ; Lin and Fu , ; Oberländer‐Hayn et al ., ]. During the last several decades of the 20th century, Antarctic lower stratospheric temperatures were influenced not only by cooling linked to ozone losses but also by dynamical warming via increased downwelling [ Lin et al ., ; Calvo et al ., ; Ivy et al ., ]. The Antarctic ozone loss is extremely sensitive to temperature, and a difference of a degree or so in the spring season substantially influences chemical loss rates [ Rex et al ., ; Sinnhuber et al ., ; Solomon et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%