2009
DOI: 10.1080/09064710802342368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-use efficiency in leys: influences of growth period and clover proportion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For red clover, the temperature response of photosynthesis and nitrogen re-translocation were changed so that these processes would be faster at lower temperatures, while radiation use efficiency (RUE) was increased to further accelerate early biomass production (Table SM2.7, Figure SM2.7, and Figure SM2.8 in Paper III). The increase in RUE was motivated by findings in several previous studies in similar environments showing higher RUE than the default value (Jannink et al 1996;Singer et al 2007;Torssell et al 2007;Kiniry & Evers 2008;Riesinger et al 2009;Harbo et al 2022). Radiation use efficiency of all crops considered can vary greatly both within seasons and between years (Jannink et al 1996;Kiniry & Evers 2008;Riesinger et al 2009).…”
Section: Simulation Of the Crops And The System (Rq7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For red clover, the temperature response of photosynthesis and nitrogen re-translocation were changed so that these processes would be faster at lower temperatures, while radiation use efficiency (RUE) was increased to further accelerate early biomass production (Table SM2.7, Figure SM2.7, and Figure SM2.8 in Paper III). The increase in RUE was motivated by findings in several previous studies in similar environments showing higher RUE than the default value (Jannink et al 1996;Singer et al 2007;Torssell et al 2007;Kiniry & Evers 2008;Riesinger et al 2009;Harbo et al 2022). Radiation use efficiency of all crops considered can vary greatly both within seasons and between years (Jannink et al 1996;Kiniry & Evers 2008;Riesinger et al 2009).…”
Section: Simulation Of the Crops And The System (Rq7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in RUE was motivated by findings in several previous studies in similar environments showing higher RUE than the default value (Jannink et al 1996;Singer et al 2007;Torssell et al 2007;Kiniry & Evers 2008;Riesinger et al 2009;Harbo et al 2022). Radiation use efficiency of all crops considered can vary greatly both within seasons and between years (Jannink et al 1996;Kiniry & Evers 2008;Riesinger et al 2009). However, in those studies RUE was rarely lower than 1.5 (APSIM red clover default value) and often approached 2, so an increase was considered realistic.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Crops And The System (Rq7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual herbage harvested by the farmers was projected from our biomass measurements with a grassland growth model (see Riesinger et al 2008). Driving variables in model application comprised daily means of air temperature, relative air humidity, and wind speed, and daily sums of incoming solar radiation, and precipitation.…”
Section: Soil and Herbage Datamentioning
confidence: 99%