Model predictions of bound (i.e,, nonlinearly forced by and coupled to wave groups) infragravity wave enryaecompared with about 2 years of observations in 8-to 13-rn depths at Imperial Beach. California, and r-% Barbers Pointm Hawaii. Frequency-directional spectra of free waves at sea and swell frequencies, estimated with a small array of four pressure sensors, are used to predict the bound wave spectra below 0.04 Hz. The predicted S• total bound wave energy is always less than the observed infragravity energy, and the underprediction increases c with increasing water depth and especially with decreasing swell energy. At most half, and usually much less. of the observed infragravity energy is bound. Bound wave spectra are also predicted with data from a single wave gage in 183-m depth at Point Conception. California, and the assumption of unidirectional sea and swell. Even with energetic swell, less than 10% of the total observed infragravity energy in 183-m depth is bound Free waves, either leaky or edge waves, are more energetic than bound waves at both the shallow and deep sites. The low level of infragravity energy observed in 183-m depth compared with 8-to 13-m depths, with similarly moderate sea and swell energy, suggests that leaky (and very high-mode edge) waves contribute less than 10% of the infragravity energy in 8-13 m. Most of the free infragravity energy in shallow water is refractively 98 sra andnriaý cTeea4
INTRODUC171ONFollowing the early observations by Munk [1949] and Tucker Infragravity waves are believed to be an important factnr in [19501 suggesting that the seaward propagating infragravity wave several nearshore processes. The purpose of this paper is to estiamplitude was at least as large as the amplitudes of the shoreward mate the contribution of bound waves to infragravity energy propagating bound wave, Longuet-Higgins and Stewart 11962] observed well outside the surf zone in depths of both -10 and speculated that the incoming bound wave somehow reflects from -200 m. Infragravity motions (typical periods of 25-200 s on the shoreline and radiates seaward as a free wave. Numerical Pacific coasts) coupled to incident wave (typical periods of models [Symonds et al., 1982) suggest that slow modulation of the 4-25 s) groups were first observed in roughly 15 m depth by breakpoint position at the group frequency results i, long-wave Munk [1949] and Tucker [19501, who showed suggestive correlaradiation seaward from the breakpoint, but laboratory results are tions between wave groups and low-frequency motions. In both inconclusive. Kosten~se [1984] measured the amplitudes of cases the infragravity wave heights were about 10% of the infragravity waves in shallow water induced by wave grouping in incident wave heights. a long wave channel with a plane beach at one end. The observed Weak nonlinear interactions between first-order free waves (sea and theoretical bound wave amplitudes agreed, but there were and swell) of nearly equal frequency is one possible mechanism of significant differences b...