1965
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1965)004<0544:rsfatt>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Shields for Air Temperature Thermometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each level, an unaspirated 36 a.w.g. copper-constantan thermocouple was positioned centrally within an open-ended radiation shield which consisted of fiberglass pipe insulation with a 2.5 cm wall thickness and an outer wrapping of highly reflective aluminized tape to protect against radiant heating (Fuchs and Tanner, 1965).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each level, an unaspirated 36 a.w.g. copper-constantan thermocouple was positioned centrally within an open-ended radiation shield which consisted of fiberglass pipe insulation with a 2.5 cm wall thickness and an outer wrapping of highly reflective aluminized tape to protect against radiant heating (Fuchs and Tanner, 1965).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the housings, a linearized thermistor which measured T, was inserted The radiation shields were made of polyurethane tubing wrapped on the outside with aluminized tape. The tape has a very high reflectivity and forms an effective barrier to solar radiation (Fuchs and Tanner, 1965). The inner surface of the inner shield was painted with flat black paint, and the inner surface of the outer shield was covered in aluminized tape.…”
Section: Construction Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind [13], radiation [14], and different coatings [15] displayed remarkable impacts on the energy balance of the screens, which might lead to 2-8 reflecting white to light beige. The temperature measured with the older screen was larger, and the maximum instantaneous difference was 1.63…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%