1968
DOI: 10.1128/jb.96.1.280-282.1968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-sensitive and radiation-resistant mutants of Haemophilus influenzae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the survivors in bacterial cultures subjected to high irradiation doses, cells more radioresistant than the parent strain have oftentimes been isolated. This has been reported for cultures of Escherichia coli (10,16), a strain of Alcaligenes (13), and Haemophilus influenza (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Among the survivors in bacterial cultures subjected to high irradiation doses, cells more radioresistant than the parent strain have oftentimes been isolated. This has been reported for cultures of Escherichia coli (10,16), a strain of Alcaligenes (13), and Haemophilus influenza (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…If strain BC200 would carry a defective phage, no prophage induction would be detected (3). Strain BC200 is less sensitive to UV irradiation than an Rd strain of H. influenzae (1). However, since the cell survival after UV irradiation of strain HM5(BC200) (constructed by transfer of the mutation conferring MC sensitivity upon strain HM5 into the BC200 strain) was, relative to that of the BC200 strain, reduced to the same extent ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all matings involving a Rec+ recipient, 125 ,ug of DNase per ml was added to the mating mixture. The plates were incubated for 2 or 3 h before the cells were suspended and plated with antibiotics selective for each of the donors, the recipient and the transconjugants (5 ,ug of ampicillin per ml, 4 novobiocin per ml, 250 jig of streptomycin per ml, 7 ,ug of kanamycin per ml). The frequency of conjugative transfer was expressed as the number of transconjugants per recipient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%