2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation protraction schedules for low-grade gliomas: a comparison between different mathematical models

Abstract: We optimize radiotherapy (RT) administration strategies for treating low-grade gliomas. Specifically, we consider different tumour growth laws, both with and without spatial effects. In each scenario, we find the optimal treatment in the sense of maximizing the overall survival time of a virtual low-grade glioma patient, whose tumour progresses according to the examined growth laws. We discover that an extreme protraction therapeutic strategy, which amounts to substantially extending the time interval … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several aspects of DLGGs have already been the objects of models, from their origin [ 15 ] to their natural evolution [ 11 , 16 ], their response to treatments (in particular, with RT [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]), and their anaplastic transformation [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several aspects of DLGGs have already been the objects of models, from their origin [ 15 ] to their natural evolution [ 11 , 16 ], their response to treatments (in particular, with RT [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]), and their anaplastic transformation [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the conventional RT administration schedule, consisting of 30 fractions of 1.8 Gy given from Monday to Friday for six consecutive weeks [ 21 ], we fixed the radiation dose Gy. The parameters , , , , , , (1.8 Gy) and (1.8 Gy) and the initial populations and were fitted for each patient’s volumetric data using the Matlab (R2020b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) function fmincon.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of mathematical studies have constructed in-silico models to determine the optimal delivery scheme for either radiation therapy [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] or chemotherapy [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] alone. However, although mathematical models have potential for the study of optimal combination treatments [ 28 ], no studies have addressed computationally the question of what might be the best combination scheme of TMZ and RT for LGGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, we [ 9 ] and others [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] have attempted to connect models capturing the dynamics of tumor growth with the efficacy of RT. Beyond characterizing response to RT, these mechanism-based and machine learning techniques can also be used to predict response [ 9 , 14 ], identify optimal treatment strategies [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], and evaluate alternative schedules based off different growth assumptions [ 19 ]. In the works of Rockne et al [ 13 ] and Prokopiou et al [ 12 ], the effects of RT were assumed to result in the immediate loss of tumor cells (or reduction in tumor volume) as estimated from the LQ model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%