2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2007.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation performance of dish solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
101
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
101
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that errors behave as random variables with normal distributions, the irregularities at the concentrator surface can be characterized by the standard deviation σ [8]. In [10] it is pointed out that σ = 3.45mrad whereas in [8] σ = 6.7mrad. We choose this uncertain value to be the former, since it is considered to yield a more representative focal flux distribution of that observed in the concentrator already deployed.…”
Section: A Sunlight and Optical Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that errors behave as random variables with normal distributions, the irregularities at the concentrator surface can be characterized by the standard deviation σ [8]. In [10] it is pointed out that σ = 3.45mrad whereas in [8] σ = 6.7mrad. We choose this uncertain value to be the former, since it is considered to yield a more representative focal flux distribution of that observed in the concentrator already deployed.…”
Section: A Sunlight and Optical Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of different cavity receivers was investigated by various authors [92,95,96]. Shuai et al [92] investigated different classical cavity geometries and found that the shape of the cavity (geometry) has a significant effect on the overall distribution of the radiation flux in the cavity receiver. According to Shuai et al [92], an upside-down pear cavity might be an appropriate shape.…”
Section: Solar Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shuai et al [92] investigated different classical cavity geometries and found that the shape of the cavity (geometry) has a significant effect on the overall distribution of the radiation flux in the cavity receiver. According to Shuai et al [92], an upside-down pear cavity might be an appropriate shape. Prakash et al [95] investigated heat losses from a cavity receiver at different inclination angles, with frontal and side winds.…”
Section: Solar Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a relatively homogeneous temperature distribution on the absorber surface of the cavity receiver is one of the most important design objectives. In previous works, most of the attention has been focused on the cavity geometrical optimization to achieve a relatively uniform light flux distribution [2]. This study proposes an attempt to optimize the shape of a cavity receiver and concentrator based on fulfilling the requirements of flux distribution on the receiver walls set by the designer of the hybrid receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%