2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Oncology Resident Research Productivity in the United States: 2015 to 2019

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the female representation of radiation oncology residents remains behind that of less competitive subspecialties such as hematology oncology (10), the 5.5-9.2% increase in female radiation oncology resident representation over the recent six-year period in this study (4,5) averages to an approximate 0.9-1.5% increase per There were no statistically significant differences between male and female residents. PRP, at least one pre-residency peer-reviewed publication; PhD, presence of a PhD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the female representation of radiation oncology residents remains behind that of less competitive subspecialties such as hematology oncology (10), the 5.5-9.2% increase in female radiation oncology resident representation over the recent six-year period in this study (4,5) averages to an approximate 0.9-1.5% increase per There were no statistically significant differences between male and female residents. PRP, at least one pre-residency peer-reviewed publication; PhD, presence of a PhD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Of 195 residents examined from the 2022 class, 61 (31.3%) were women, representing a 5-9 percent increase from the resident class of 2016 based on the available literature: one publication comprised of 163 residents revealed a 22.1% rate of women (4) and another publication comprised of 182 residents revealed a 25.8% rate of women (5). Fourfifths of female residents (80%) had at least one PRP, 31% had dual degrees, and 18% had a PhD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSc, MPH, PhD). Among a total of 13 studies, this was associated with higher productivity in six [ 15 , 23 – 26 , 34 ], no difference in five [ 13 , 21 , 28 , 31 , 33 ], and in two studies this was associated with lower productivity [ 18 , 19 ]. Of four studies that looked at past research experience that was not specifically related to higher degree [ 12 , 26 , 29 , 32 ], three found this to be a significant factor associated with graduate medical training research productivity [ 12 , 26 , 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies examined the gender of trainees as a determinant of publication success and found that males had higher productivity in five studies [ 18 20 , 29 , 32 ], females in one study [ 26 ], and no difference was observed in five studies [ 12 , 13 , 17 , 21 , 30 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation