2019
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz3408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation is not a political tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activities of healthcare students who have actually experienced and studied in the disaster area are likely to attract attention from people in and out of the prefecture. In particular, the active dissemination of information abroad by healthcare students is expected to play a role in effective communication and transmission of information on radiation, which can be unfortunately and easily used as a political issue inside and outside Japan (Murakami et al, 2019). Finally, healthcare students can learn a great deal about disaster medicine through these activities, which may prove useful in their future work as healthcare professionals in disaster response.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activities of healthcare students who have actually experienced and studied in the disaster area are likely to attract attention from people in and out of the prefecture. In particular, the active dissemination of information abroad by healthcare students is expected to play a role in effective communication and transmission of information on radiation, which can be unfortunately and easily used as a political issue inside and outside Japan (Murakami et al, 2019). Finally, healthcare students can learn a great deal about disaster medicine through these activities, which may prove useful in their future work as healthcare professionals in disaster response.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] It has been established that sociocultural background and immediate response to trauma are also fundamental drivers behind risk perception among the general public. 5,[12][13][14] However, excessive degrees of risk perception have been linked to poor health through increased levels of psychological distress, 15,16 adverse mental health status, 17 reduced frequency of laughter, 18 and incitation of feelings of social unrest through behaviors promoting discrimination against refugees, 19,20 as well as avoidance of food products from affected areas, 21 and exaggerated notions of the dangers of the surrounding environment. 22 Additionally, risk perception and health status dictate decisionmaking such as the intention to return (ITR) to hometowns by evacuees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, although food products from the Fukushima Prefecture and other affected areas that exceed the standard value are extremely limited [ 5 ], nine countries, (China, Korea, Indonesia, United Kingdom, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Russia) and five regions (Macau, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Polynesia, and the European Union) restrict the import of these products [ 6 ]. This cannot be based on science as the food is distributed and exported based on strict standard values [ 7 ]. The reputational damage of Fukushima products has been spreading, not only in Japan but also in the world, and it can be said that this damage is ongoing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%