Radiation information and resources on-line

Busby, Bruce

doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00030-6

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the field of radiation safety, there is very little published literature on the utility of web-based resources. Busby (2002) published a broad set of web-based resources on ‘radiation’ which included basic and applied science, health effects, regulators, and related organisations. The target audience was the general public, health professionals, policy makers, and scientists.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet-based ICRP resource for healthcare providers on the risks and benefits of medical imaging that uses ionising radiation

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Committee 3 Working Party was to update the 2001 web-based module 'Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners' from ICRP. The key elements of this task were: to clearly identify the target audience (such as healthcare providers with an emphasis on primary care); to review other reputable sources of information; and to succinctly publish the contribution made by ICRP to the various topics. A 'question-and-answer' format addressing practical topics was adopted. These topics included benefits and risks of imaging using ionising radiation in common medical situations, as well as pertaining to specific populations such as pregnant, breast-feeding, and paediatric patients. In general, the benefits of medical imaging and related procedures far outweigh the potential risks associated with ionising radiation exposure. However, it is still important to ensure that the examinations are clinically justified, that the procedure is optimised to deliver the lowest dose commensurate with the medical purpose, and that consideration is given to diagnostic reference levels for particular classes of examinations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%