1994
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90188-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-induced lung damage in rats: The influence of fraction spacing on effect per fraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also different irradiation facilities were used in the two studies (due to the decommissioning of the Co-60 treatment facility) with different dose rates and different expected relative biological effectiveness. The difference in the doses delivered was designed to address these latter two issues based on our previous experience (Newcomb et al 1993, Haston et al 1994) but the accommodation may not have been exact. Regardless, the difference in the results from these two experiments could be very important, since it suggests the possibility that the mitigation of radiation-induced pneumonitis and functional lung damage may be more effective at lower levels of overall lung damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also different irradiation facilities were used in the two studies (due to the decommissioning of the Co-60 treatment facility) with different dose rates and different expected relative biological effectiveness. The difference in the doses delivered was designed to address these latter two issues based on our previous experience (Newcomb et al 1993, Haston et al 1994) but the accommodation may not have been exact. Regardless, the difference in the results from these two experiments could be very important, since it suggests the possibility that the mitigation of radiation-induced pneumonitis and functional lung damage may be more effective at lower levels of overall lung damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dose of 18 Gy (dose rate approximately 0.5 Gy/min) was given to all animals, which were irradiated in groups of four. It was anticipated from previous studies (23, 28, 29) that, at the dose rate used, this dose of 18 Gy would be approximately equivalent to 14 Gy at a dose rate above 1 Gy/min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the past, efforts to escalate the dose for treatment of lung cancer have been limited by early esophageal and late pulmonary, spinal cord, cardiac, and esophageal toxicity. Radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity is well established, and its severity is increased in direct correlation with dose, volume, and fraction size [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%