2013
DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.jns12402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-induced imaging changes following Gamma Knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations

Abstract: Radiation-induced imaging changes are the most common adverse effects following GKS. Fortunately, few of the RIICs are symptomatic and most of the symptoms are reversible. Patients with a relatively healthy brain and nidi that are large, or with a single draining vein, are more likely to develop RIICs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
77
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, most patients develop AREs in the initial 7-to 12-month period after GKRS, with a noted delay in ARE development in those patients in whom subtotal obliteration is finally achieved (a median of 10 months to the ARE appearance and 16 months for the ARE peak). In accordance with previous reports stating that the development of AREs often predicts AVM obliteration for many patients, 43 a similar finding is demonstrated in our cohort. The ARE index tool seems to better emphasize that patients who had only a subtotal, partial, or minimal angiographic response to GKRS also developed AREs to a much lower extent than patients who later developed a complete AVM nidus obliteration ( Table 3).…”
Section: 21supporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1, most patients develop AREs in the initial 7-to 12-month period after GKRS, with a noted delay in ARE development in those patients in whom subtotal obliteration is finally achieved (a median of 10 months to the ARE appearance and 16 months for the ARE peak). In accordance with previous reports stating that the development of AREs often predicts AVM obliteration for many patients, 43 a similar finding is demonstrated in our cohort. The ARE index tool seems to better emphasize that patients who had only a subtotal, partial, or minimal angiographic response to GKRS also developed AREs to a much lower extent than patients who later developed a complete AVM nidus obliteration ( Table 3).…”
Section: 21supporting
confidence: 81%
“…37 Through extensive follow-up, we have found that a significant number of patients with symptomatic radiation-induced changes will recover over time. 43 An appreciable ARE index value defined after univariate and multivariate analysis (Table 4) was defined as a minimum ARE index > 8.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,11,28 Embolization decreases the volume of the AVM nidus, permitting a higher radiosurgical dose to be delivered to the smaller nidus. This approach is believed to lead to less morbidity 31,59,69 and a higher obliteration rate following SRS. 27 In addition, embolization can reduce the risk of AVM rupture by eliminating intranidal aneurysms and reduce the flow in shunting vessels by blocking the high-flow fistulas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grading system described by Yen et al was used. 69 Mild imaging changes with an area of increased T2 signal measuring less than 10 mm in thickness surrounding the treated nidi and imposing no mass effect were considered to represent Grade I AREs. Moderate imaging changes with increased T2 signal in areas of 10 mm thickness or greater, with some mass effect causing effacement of the sulci or compression of the adjacent ventricles, constituted Grade II; and severe imaging changes that caused midline shift of the brain, Grade III.…”
Section: Imaging Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%