2005
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7512.350
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation from CT and perfusion scanning in pregnancy

Abstract: An 83 year old man had an acute attack of gout. He treated himself with colchicine drops (2 mg in two days) and received diclofenac because of continuous pain. Concurrently he had muscle weakness in his limbs. Four days later he became immobile and was transferred to hospital with flaccid tetraparesis (British Medical Research Council grade II-III). He had no signs of infection, hepatic or renal impairments, or stroke. Laboratory values were normal except a brief increase of creatine kinase to 1288.2 IU/l. Rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
1
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
64
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimated foetal radiation exposure for CTPA varies from 3.3 mGy to 130.0 mGy. However, the foetal radiation dose for V/Q scanning is estimated around 100-370 mGy, which is three times higher than CTPA [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated foetal radiation exposure for CTPA varies from 3.3 mGy to 130.0 mGy. However, the foetal radiation dose for V/Q scanning is estimated around 100-370 mGy, which is three times higher than CTPA [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should DVT imaging be negative or unavailable, a ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan or computer tomographic pulmonary angiography (CT-PA) is indicated for the diagnosis of PE [16,31]. While the reported fetal radiation dose associated with a CT-PA is 0.01 milliGray (mGy), the fetal radiation dose associated with the perfusion part of the V/Q scan is 0.12 mGy; correlating with projections of fatal malignancy to 15 years of age of < 1/1,000,000 and 1/280,000, respectively [32]. Whereas this may render the CT-PA a better modality form the fetal perspective, it should be noted that the degree of fetal radiation for both CT-PA and the perfusion portion of the V/Q scan are well below the safety thresholds, lack teratogenic associations, and reflect extremely low absolute risks [33].…”
Section: Pulmonary Embolism (Pe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The radiation dose to the mother's thorax with CTPA will be around 2 rads and it is known that 1 rad will increase the lifetime risk of breast cancer by around 14 per cent. 30,31 This is an important consideration when only around 1 in 20 pregnant women with suspected PE will have the diagnosis confirmed. Therefore, although CTPA has rapidly gained acceptance as a robust technique among both radiologists and clinicians in non-pregnant patients, its role in pregnancy is not clearly defined and is often not addressed in published guidelines.…”
Section: Clinical Situation Suggested Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%