2005
DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.031526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposure to personnel performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Abstract: Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) relies on the use of ionising radiation but risks to operator and patient associated with radiation exposure are unclear. The aim of this prospective study was to estimate the radiation dose received by personnel performing fluoroscopic endoscopic procedures, mainly ERCP. Methods: Consecutive procedures over a two month period were included. The use of thermoluminescent dosimeters to measure radiation exposure to the abdomen, thyroid gland, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
2
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent small study of 66 procedures, the estimated annual whole-body effective dose equivalent received by the endoscopists ranged between 3.35 and 5.87 mSv. 16 This dose is thought to be within safety limits for radiation exposure to personnel. The International Commission on Radiologic Protection has classified radiation exposure as low (Յ3 mSv per year, which is the background level of radiation from natural sources in the United States), moderate (3-20 mSv per year, which is the upper annual limit for occupational exposure for at-risk workers averaged over 5 years), or high (Ͼ20-50 mSv per year, the upper annual limit for occupational exposure for at-risk workers in any given year).…”
Section: Radiation Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent small study of 66 procedures, the estimated annual whole-body effective dose equivalent received by the endoscopists ranged between 3.35 and 5.87 mSv. 16 This dose is thought to be within safety limits for radiation exposure to personnel. The International Commission on Radiologic Protection has classified radiation exposure as low (Յ3 mSv per year, which is the background level of radiation from natural sources in the United States), moderate (3-20 mSv per year, which is the upper annual limit for occupational exposure for at-risk workers averaged over 5 years), or high (Ͼ20-50 mSv per year, the upper annual limit for occupational exposure for at-risk workers in any given year).…”
Section: Radiation Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERCP was initially used as a purely diagnostic procedure; however, over the last two decades, therapeutic applications have been developed [1,2]. Therapeutic procedures typically require longer ñuoroscopy times (than diagnostic procedures) and result in a higher radiation dose [3]. During interventional ERCP procedures, ñuoroscopic and radiographic images are taken, with staff positioned near the patient [4].…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…waves. 10 However, another study showed that 0.5-mm or thicker lead aprons are necessary for protection purposes when performing ERCP. 11,12 Therefore, it is safe to assume that 0.5-mm or thicker lead aprons will be more effective for protection against radiation exposure when performing therapeutic ERCP.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Radiation Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%