1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0194-59989570245-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposure in paranasal sinus imaging

Abstract: Plain films of the paranasal sinus were the imaging technique most frequently used before the advent of computed tomography. With improved resolution, computed tomography imaging has become the standard for evaluating patients with disease of the paranasal sinuses. With the widespread availability of computed tomography scanning, patients are likely to undergo multiple examinations during the treatment of their disease. Concern has been raised over the radiation exposure to the patient, in particular, with reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite some concerns about radiation dosage associated with this section CT scanning, the radiation dose from such scans is significantly below the radiation dose necessary for acute cataracts. 18 Furthermore, Kew et al 19 have already established importance of sagittal images for the characterization of frontal recess anatomy; in the current paper, the sagittal CT images were critical in the assessment of ANC, FC, SBC, and FBC. Finally, it is conceivable that the differences in prevalence reported in the various studies represent true differences in patient anatomy that occur in various patient populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite some concerns about radiation dosage associated with this section CT scanning, the radiation dose from such scans is significantly below the radiation dose necessary for acute cataracts. 18 Furthermore, Kew et al 19 have already established importance of sagittal images for the characterization of frontal recess anatomy; in the current paper, the sagittal CT images were critical in the assessment of ANC, FC, SBC, and FBC. Finally, it is conceivable that the differences in prevalence reported in the various studies represent true differences in patient anatomy that occur in various patient populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Certainly, the current study's CT scan data (high‐resolution, 1‐mm axial images with coronal and sagittal reconstructions) provide a more complete representation of patient anatomy, when compared with a standard 3‐mm coronal sinus CT, which is the mainstay of most CT sinus anatomy studies. Despite some concerns about radiation dosage associated with this section CT scanning, the radiation dose from such scans is significantly below the radiation dose necessary for acute cataracts 18 . Furthermore, Kew et al 19 have already established importance of sagittal images for the characterization of frontal recess anatomy; in the current paper, the sagittal CT images were critical in the assessment of ANC, FC, SBC, and FBC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The radiation dose from such a protocol appears to be within the range of previously measured values with spiral scans. 3,4,7,10,12,13 Lower doses, in the 10-20 mGy range, have been described, 6,9,14,15 but these have been typically obtained with different protocols. Our measured doses are still much lower than the 500 mGy threshold for lens damage and thus appear to be clinically safe, especially as patients are unlikely to need more than 1 or 2 such fine scans in a lifetime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%