2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02269-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Exposure During Transarterial Chemoembolization: Angio-CT Versus Cone-Beam CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Common CT scanning methods in clinic include routine scanning and enhanced scanning. Among them, the enhanced scan introduces a contrast agent into the body to enhance the contrast of the observed object, and it is easy to distinguish the lesion area [2]. CT contrast agents currently used clinically are mainly iodine contrast agents; however, large doses of iodine can cause harm to the human body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common CT scanning methods in clinic include routine scanning and enhanced scanning. Among them, the enhanced scan introduces a contrast agent into the body to enhance the contrast of the observed object, and it is easy to distinguish the lesion area [2]. CT contrast agents currently used clinically are mainly iodine contrast agents; however, large doses of iodine can cause harm to the human body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablation for RAML have been gradually confirmed (1,7,8). The introduction and clinical application of angio-computed tomography (angio-CT) devices have enabled the integration of SAE and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), improved imaging quality, and made operations simpler and safer (9,10). The present study retrospectively analyzed the results from 6 patients with RAML treated with SAE+RFA, to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this new combination approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CBCT, these factors are also procedure (ie, projection) specific (31). According to a recent study, the radiation dose of angio-CT is less than the radiation dose of CBCT when automatic exposure control is used (32). If noise levels are matched between angio-CT and CBCT, the radiation dose is approximately the same for angio-CT and CBCT.…”
Section: Comparison With Cbctmentioning
confidence: 99%