2014
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposure and attributed cancer risk following lung transplantation

Abstract: Lung transplant recipients are exposed to 7.8 times greater radiation dose from medical imaging compared to the general population. Nevertheless, the lifetime increase in cancer risk due to radiation is small.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum permissible occupational radiation exposure in the US is 50 millisievert (mSv) per year or 100 mSv over 5 years [3] while background radiation is about 3 mSv annually [4]. The lifetime excess risk of death from cancer has been estimated to increase by approximately 0.4% with 100 mSv of cumulative radiation exposure [5] and to be 5% per sievert [6]. It is controversial whether cumulative doses below 100 mSv increase the risk of malignancy [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum permissible occupational radiation exposure in the US is 50 millisievert (mSv) per year or 100 mSv over 5 years [3] while background radiation is about 3 mSv annually [4]. The lifetime excess risk of death from cancer has been estimated to increase by approximately 0.4% with 100 mSv of cumulative radiation exposure [5] and to be 5% per sievert [6]. It is controversial whether cumulative doses below 100 mSv increase the risk of malignancy [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This radiation exposure is associated with a lifetime increase in cancer risk. 10 Chest DTS utilizes about 5% the radiation dose required chest CT. 11,12 The radiation dose for a chest DTS is 0.08 to 0.13 mSv compared with 1 to 4 mSv for a typical chest CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean CED at the end of dose follow-up would have been significantly higher, by nearly two times, if estimated according to methodology used by Rosengarten et al [4] : 205.4 ± 86.0 (SD) mSv (range: 47-489.1 mSv) vs 110.0 ± 51.6 (SD) mSv (range: 13-261.3 mSv) ; P<0.001) (Table 1).…”
Section: Cumulative Effective and Organ Dosesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Briefly, the number of ionizing procedures was multiplied by the corresponding published reference effective dose: 0.1mSv for CXR, 7mSv for chest CT, 8mSV for abdominal CT, 2.5mSv for V/Q scans, 14.1mSv for PET and 0.4mSv for mammogram [4,14]. Thus, calculated and estimated CED were available for each patient.…”
Section: Carlo-based Program This Program Calculates Effective and Or...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation