2007
DOI: 10.1175/jtech2019.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Dry Bias of the Vaisala RS92 Humidity Sensor

Abstract: The comparison of simultaneous humidity measurements by the Vaisala RS92 radiosonde and by the Cryogenic Frostpoint Hygrometer (CFH) launched at Alajuela, Costa Rica, during July 2005 reveals a large solar radiation dry bias of the Vaisala RS92 humidity sensor and a minor temperature-dependent calibration error. For soundings launched at solar zenith angles between 10°and 30°, the average dry bias is on the order of 9% at the surface and increases to 50% at 15 km. A simple pressure-and temperature-dependent co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
248
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
21
248
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both widely used radiosonde types RS80 and RS9x suffer from a well-known dry bias in their humidity measurements, caused by different error sources: chemical contamination and sensor ageing for the RS80 (see Sect. 2.3 and Van Malderen and De Backer, 2010, and references therein) and solar radiation for daytime RS9x observations (Vömel et al, 2007). The RS80 humidity measurements at Uccle were corrected by the method developed by Leiterer et al (2005), which is currently the best available correction scheme for this radiosonde type (Suortti et al, 2008).…”
Section: Radiosondesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both widely used radiosonde types RS80 and RS9x suffer from a well-known dry bias in their humidity measurements, caused by different error sources: chemical contamination and sensor ageing for the RS80 (see Sect. 2.3 and Van Malderen and De Backer, 2010, and references therein) and solar radiation for daytime RS9x observations (Vömel et al, 2007). The RS80 humidity measurements at Uccle were corrected by the method developed by Leiterer et al (2005), which is currently the best available correction scheme for this radiosonde type (Suortti et al, 2008).…”
Section: Radiosondesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the instrument errors of the different radiosonde types are small. Humidity data were rejected above 300 hPa due to a notable dry bias at low temperatures especially with the RS-90 and RS-80 radiosondes (Vömel et al, 2007).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a possibility that both radiosondes have biases with opposing signs. The Vaisala-RS92 relative humidity sensor is known to have a solar radiation dry bias of up to ~50% in the upper troposphere (Vömel et al 2007;Miloshevich et al 2009). The software that we used was version 3.63 of Vaisala's DigiCORA Sounding System.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%