2015
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers

Abstract: Purpose:To summarize data on computed tomographic (CT) radiation doses collected from consecutive CT examinations performed at 12 facilities that can contribute to the creation of reference levels. Materials and Methods:The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the collaborating institutions and was compliant with HIPAA. Radiation dose metrics were prospectively and electronically collected from 199 656 consecutive CT examinations in 83 181 adults and 3871 consecutive CT examinations in 2609… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
81
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study conducted by the University of California Dose Optimization and Standardization Endeavor (UC Dose) summarizing CT doses across 12 University of California medical centers found that head scans comprised 16% of all adult CT examinations . The same study also found that the most frequent area imaged in pediatric patients was the head, accounting for 33% of the total procedures administered . The fact that radiation exposure from head CT examinations is a large contributor to the total medical radiation exposures underscores the need for accurate patient dose assessments from head CT procedures, particularly for younger patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study conducted by the University of California Dose Optimization and Standardization Endeavor (UC Dose) summarizing CT doses across 12 University of California medical centers found that head scans comprised 16% of all adult CT examinations . The same study also found that the most frequent area imaged in pediatric patients was the head, accounting for 33% of the total procedures administered . The fact that radiation exposure from head CT examinations is a large contributor to the total medical radiation exposures underscores the need for accurate patient dose assessments from head CT procedures, particularly for younger patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A group has also developed automated alerts for high-dose computed tomography (CT) exams based on how they compare to institutional average [18]. Recent experience in San Francisco medical centers is also now available for more general comparisons [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapy related myeloid neoplasm, the development of either Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), following exposure to therapeutic radiotherapy treatment, is well described and has a poor prognosis 4 . The impact of low dose (ie: less than 100mSv) radiation exposure, such as that conceivable from repeated CT imaging 5 , on the risk of subsequently developing acute leukemia was however less clear. in this issue of Lancet Haematology the work from Little and colleagues 6 convincingly suggests, using data from nine cohorts totaling over a quarter of a million children (including 137 cases of acute leukemia and MDS), that even low dose radiation exposure is associated with low, but quantifiable, increased risk of acute leukemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the authors state; this work re-enforces rather than challenges existing radiation protection guidelines. It may however stimulate reflection and allow conversations to ensure local radiology facilities are practicing according to best principles 2,3 to consistently limit radiation doses used for essential tests to the lowest possible level while also reducing variation by benchmarking to reference standards 5 . Our feeling is that minimizing radiation exposure, particularly in children, is prudent while also recognizing that the benefit for CT imaging for a strong medical indication outweighs risk 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%