2008
DOI: 10.1667/rr1393.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Dose to the Brain and Subsequent Risk of Developing Brain Tumors in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Interventional Neuroradiology Procedures

Abstract: Radiation dose to the brain and subsequent lifetime risk of diagnosis of radiation-related brain tumors were estimated for pediatric patients undergoing intracranial embolization. Average dose to the whole brain was calculated using dosimetric data from the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Study for 49 pediatric patients who underwent neuroradiological procedures, and lifetime risk of developing radiation-related brain tumors was estimated using published algorithms based on A-bomb survivor data. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few data regarding dedicated risk -benefit considerations for the paediatric population, particularly regarding their increased susceptibility to diagnostic radiation-induced morbidity from CT scans 60 -61 and angiography. 62 The ethics of screening an asymptomatic child, who is too young to give consent and will likely not understand the implications of testing, also need to be carefully considered before proceeding. Institutions therefore differ in their screening regimes.…”
Section: Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few data regarding dedicated risk -benefit considerations for the paediatric population, particularly regarding their increased susceptibility to diagnostic radiation-induced morbidity from CT scans 60 -61 and angiography. 62 The ethics of screening an asymptomatic child, who is too young to give consent and will likely not understand the implications of testing, also need to be carefully considered before proceeding. Institutions therefore differ in their screening regimes.…”
Section: Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We converted the reported maximal skin dose (MSD) to an estimate of the range of brain-absorbed doses by use of previously derived age-based conversion factors. 3,4 On the basis of recent data from the UK CT study, we then estimated the predicted risk of brain tumors in this cohort, related to the procedures that the children underwent. The radiation physicist at Boston Children's Hospital worked with a Siemens design engineer in 2005 to create examination-set protocols tailored to patient size (age) and body part, with fluoroscopy and DSA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the conversion factors generated by mathematical modeling and the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures (RAD-IR) study data (in particular, Table 6 of Thierry-Chef et al), 3,4 we converted the maximal skin dose to estimates of absorbed brain dose. Absorbed brain dose varies widely (by a factor of 4 -8), depending on whether tight collimation and varying positions for the imaging system were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Onyx cohort received an average of 765 mGy/session, while the non-Onyx group received an average of 539 mGy/session. Both these values are below the range reported in the pediatric neurointerventional subset of the Radiation Dose in Interventional Radiology Study, 14 performed before Onyx was available. Furthermore, delivery of agents other than Onyx typically requires more repeated multiple microcatheterizations of various feeders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%