2018
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dose from X-ray examinations of impacted canines: cone beam CT vs two-dimensional imaging

Abstract: The effective dose from CBCT ranged from 140 times higher dose (NewTom5G compared to two periapical radiographs) to 15 times higher dose (ProMax3D compared to three periapical and one panoramic radiograph) than a 2D examination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CBCT imaging does still have a higher dose of ionization radiation compared to two‐dimensional imaging using periapicals or panoramics (Kadesjö, Lynds, Nilsson, & Shi, 2018). From an ALARA‐ perspective, that is ionization radiation should be “as low as reasonable achievable,” the three‐dimensional imaging needs to be justified in each individual case (Sowby, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCT imaging does still have a higher dose of ionization radiation compared to two‐dimensional imaging using periapicals or panoramics (Kadesjö, Lynds, Nilsson, & Shi, 2018). From an ALARA‐ perspective, that is ionization radiation should be “as low as reasonable achievable,” the three‐dimensional imaging needs to be justified in each individual case (Sowby, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observer calibration was performed according to PAI score system, obtaining adequate Kappa values for intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility ( 27 ). Panoramic radiographs showed high specificity and positive predictive value diagnosing apical periodontitis ( 36 ), can be obtained with convenience and speed, and have the advantage of producing an average patient exposure of only 4.1μSv ( 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on phantom studies, CBCT scans of a 10-yearold result in 15 to 140 times higher organ doses compared to conventional dental radiography [14], and the received equivalent dose is significantly higher in children than in adults during CBCT examinations especially in maxillary regions [15,16]. Based on dosimetry of patients during CBCT, and conversion of skin doses to organ dose, the lifetime attributed cancer risk has been estimated as 9.8 per million for 8-to 11-year-olds and 2.7 per million for older than 60 years, the risk being 40% higher for females [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%