1989
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/34/3/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dose factors for alpha -emitters in osteons and some considerations on dose non-uniformity ratios and relative distribution factors

Abstract: Dose factors for locations within a tissue-filled cylindrical cavity bounded by an infinite medium of bone labelled with an alpha-emitter are calculated by means of a Monte Carlo procedure. The calculational approach is general and allows us to determine dose factors for specific distances or target volumes defined by concentric cylinders, as well as various source geometries including surface sources, buried surface sources, infinite and bounded volume sources, and also comprises plane (trabecular) surfaces a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For beagles it is even more so because the body dimensions of beagles are much smaller than those of humans. The absorbed fractions of alpha particle energy were calculated using a Monte Carlo method, as described previously (Polig 1989b), and assumed an alpha particle energy of 5.41 MeV. Table 4 lists the absorbed fractions for all relevant source-target combinations.…”
Section: Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For beagles it is even more so because the body dimensions of beagles are much smaller than those of humans. The absorbed fractions of alpha particle energy were calculated using a Monte Carlo method, as described previously (Polig 1989b), and assumed an alpha particle energy of 5.41 MeV. Table 4 lists the absorbed fractions for all relevant source-target combinations.…”
Section: Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model parameters were determined from retention and excretion measurements by optimization procedures, whereas the portion representing the skeleton was defined on the basis of histomorphometric and autoradiographic investigations. Dosimetric evaluations were performed as well by employing newly calculated fractions of absorbed energy based on a Monte Carlo method (Polig 1989b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%