2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05889-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer: A systematic review of measurement properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While blistering and peeling were asked by both patients and staff to determine concordance, the presence of MD was only evaluated by the clinical staff. A recent systematic review of radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer described only one PRO measure that evaluated desquamation [ 18 ]. However, this PRO measure Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT), developed by Berthelet et al [ 19 ], had three components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While blistering and peeling were asked by both patients and staff to determine concordance, the presence of MD was only evaluated by the clinical staff. A recent systematic review of radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer described only one PRO measure that evaluated desquamation [ 18 ]. However, this PRO measure Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT), developed by Berthelet et al [ 19 ], had three components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the BUS images (Figure 9B,C) showed severe skin thickening and obscuring of the dermis/hypodermis boundary at 6:00 location on the irradiated breast, so a BUS‐G2 based on breast edema was graded. Secondly, most radiation oncologists would agree that the clinician‐‐reported outcome is subjective with low to moderate inter‐observer reliability 25 . BUS is a common, portable and widely‐used breast imaging modality and its radiographic features can be used to evaluate radiation‐induced skin thickening and edema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTCAE scores showed minimal to moderate correlation with the skin toxicity assessment tools (ie, erythema, burning, itching, pulling, tenderness) 24 . In a comprehensive review of the published clinician‐reported outcomes of scoring radiation dermatitis, Behroozian et al concluded that there is insufficient evidence to establish a “gold standard” based on CTCAE or any single clinician‐reported outcome to assess the radiation dermatitis 25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large retrospective study comprising 666 salivary gland cancers, the ACE-27 score was found to significantly correlate with OS, whereas the disease-specific survival was not affected [ 30 ]. In our study, both ECOG performance status and CCI were able to discriminate the survival rates of elderly patients with salivary gland cancer after (chemo)radiotherapy; however, a standardized survey of the patients’ comorbidities using the CCI or ACE-27 may reduce the intra- and interobserver variability that is known to be an issue regarding the assessment of the performance status [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%