2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01874-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation damage in silicon detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The annealing properties of the samples irradiated to ∼10 15 n eq /cm 2 are quite different from those reported previously [17], especially at high bias voltages. Fig.…”
Section: Annealingcontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The annealing properties of the samples irradiated to ∼10 15 n eq /cm 2 are quite different from those reported previously [17], especially at high bias voltages. Fig.…”
Section: Annealingcontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…A long-term effect of radiation damage in a silicon detector is the ability of incoming particles to displace atoms from the lattice and create defects which can be stable at standard operating temperatures 1 . The most problematic defects are those which give rise to energy levels within the silicon bandgap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the simulation can accommodate the measured trapping rate in the same region of parameter space that maximizes the leakage current. Figure 11(b) also suggests a solution to the puzzle that the trapping rates have been shown to be unaffected by the presence of oxygen in the detector bulk [19] whereas it is well-established that the space charge effects are quite sensitive to the presence of oxygen in the material [22], [23]. It is clear from Fig 11(b) that small-cross-section trapping states can play a large role in the effective charge density but a small one in the effective trapping rates: every point on the BF line produces 100% of the effective charge density but only the larger cross section points contribute substantially to the trapping rate.…”
Section: An Improved Two-trap Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%